首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JSES Open Access >Comparison of clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a meta-analysis
【2h】

Comparison of clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: a meta-analysis

机译:作者:张莹莹王莹王莹王莹

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The ideal rotator cuff repair technique should allow for a quick and simple arthroscopic application which provides both adequate biomechanical stability and an appropriate biological state with the intention of promoting eventual healing of tendon to bone. While the biomechanical superiority of double-row repairs including higher repair strength, reduced gap formation, and wider footprint restoration have been proven, controversy remains regarding the clinical benefits of knotless compared with knot tying techniques. Our study aims to review the available evidence in the literature comparing the clinical outcomes between knotted and knotless transosseous double-row rotator cuff repair techniques.
机译:理想的转子袖带修复技术应允许快速简单的关节镜应用,其提供足够的生物力学稳定性和适当的生物状态,其目的是促进肌腱的最终愈合。虽然已经证明了包括更高的修复强度,降低的间隙形成和更广泛的足迹恢复的双排维修的生物力学优势,但争议仍然是与结捆绑技术相比的临床益处。我们的研究旨在审查文献中的可用证据,比较打结和无结传球双排旋转箍修复技术之间的临床结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号