首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Palliative Medicine >Reported Availability and Gaps of Pediatric Palliative Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Published Data
【2h】

Reported Availability and Gaps of Pediatric Palliative Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review of Published Data

机译:中低收入国家儿童姑息治疗的可获得性和差距:已发表数据的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: The majority of young people in need of palliative care live in low- and middle-income countries, where curative treatment is less available.>Objective: We systematically reviewed published data describing palliative care services available to young people with life-limiting conditions in low- and middle-income countries and assessed core elements with respect to availability, gaps, and under-reported aspects.>Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE (1980–2013), and secondary bibliographies were searched for publications that included patients younger than 25 years with life-limiting conditions and described palliative care programs in low- and middle-income countries. A data extraction checklist considered 15 items across seven domains: access, education/capacity building, health system support, pain management, symptom management, end-of-life care, and bereavement. Data were aggregated by program and country.>Results: Of 1572 records, 238 met criteria for full-text review; 34 qualified for inclusion, representing 30 programs in 21 countries. The median checklist score was 7 (range, 1–14) of 10 reported (range, 3–14). The most pervasive gaps were in national health system support (unavailable in 7 of 17 countries with programs reporting), specialized education (unavailable in 7 of 19 countries with programs reporting), and comprehensive opioid access (unavailable in 14 of 21 countries with programs reporting). Underreported elements included specified practices for pain management and end-of-life support.>Conclusion: Comprehensive pediatric palliative care provision is possible even in markedly impoverished settings. Improved national health system support, specialized training and opioid access are key targets for research and advocacy. Application of a checklist methodology can promote awareness of gaps to guide program evaluation, reporting, and strengthening.
机译:>背景:大多数需要姑息治疗的年轻人生活在中,低收入国家,这些国家的治疗方法较少。>目的:我们系统地审查了已发表的数据描述低收入和中等收入国家中有生命限制条件的年轻人所能获得的姑息治疗服务,并评估可获得性,差距和报告不足方面的核心要素。>方法: CINAHL的PubMed在EMBASE,EMBASE(1980-2013)和二级参考书目中搜索包括年龄限制在25岁以下的患者,并描述了中低收入国家的姑息治疗计划。数据提取清单考虑了七个领域的15个项目:访问,教育/能力建设,卫生系统支持,疼痛管理,症状管理,临终关怀和丧亲。 >结果:在1572条记录中,有238条符合全文审查标准; 34个有资格加入,代表了21个国家的30个计划。清单中位得分为7(范围1-14),为7(范围3-14)。最普遍的差距是国家卫生系统支持(有计划报告的17个国家中没有7个),专门教育(有计划报告的19个国家中有7个)和阿片类药物的全面获取(有计划报告的21个国家中没有阿片类药物) )。漏报的要素包括指定的疼痛处理和生命支持支持方法。>结论:即使在明显贫困的地区,也可能提供全面的儿科姑息治疗。改进的国家卫生系统支持,专门培训和阿片类药物的获取是研究和宣传的主要目标。应用清单方法可以提高对差距的认识,以指导计划评估,报告和加强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号