首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Oncology Practice >6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs

【2h】

6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs

机译：6-STEPPPs：促进临床医生参与资助新癌症药物的公平决策的模块化工具

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

Purpose:To design a tool to assist clinician participation with cancer drug funding decisions. Public policy-makers and insurers are struggling with funding decisions regarding increasingly expensive new cancer drugs. Increasingly, oncologists are contributing to the process of review that leads to such decisions. We were asked to design a system for ranking new cancer drugs for priority-based funding decisions.

机译：目的：设计一种工具来协助临床医生参与癌症药物的资助决策。公共政策制定者和保险公司正在就越来越昂贵的新癌症药物的资金决定做出努力。肿瘤学家越来越多地为导致这种决定的检查过程做出贡献。我们被要求设计一种系统，以便对基于优先级的资金决策进行新的癌症药物排名。

著录项

期刊名称 Journal of Oncology Practice
作者
George P. Browman; Braden Manns; Neil Hagen; Carole R. Chambers; Anita Simon; Shane Sinclair;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2008(4),1
年度 2008
页码 2–7
总页数 6
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类肿瘤学;
关键词

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. 6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs [J] . George P. Browman, Braden Manns, Neil Hagen, Journal of Oncology Practice . 2008,第1期

机译：6-STEPPPs：促进临床医生参与资助新癌症药物的公平决策的模块化工具
2. Clinician participation in CADTH’s pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: contribution and impact on cancer drug funding recommendations [J] . M. Trudeau, P. Hoskins, T. Reiman, Current oncology . 2017,第2期

机译：临床医生参与CADTH的《全加拿大肿瘤药物评论》：对癌症药物资助建议的贡献和影响
3. Goals-of-Care Decisions by Hospitalized Patients With Advanced Cancer: Missed Clinician Opportunities for Facilitating Shared Decision-Making [J] . Sharma Rashmi K., Cameron Kenzie A., Zech Jennifer M., Journal of pain and symptom management. . 2019,第2期

机译：住院治疗晚期癌症患者的患者的目标决策：错过了促进共享决策的临床医生机会
4. AHP's Promises and Limitations as Decision Tool for Procedural Justice; Evaluating AHP for Accuracy, Efficiency and Fair Participation [C] . Luuk Simons, Vincent Wiegel International symposium on quality function deployment . 2009

机译：AHP作为程序正义决策工具的承诺和限制;评估AHP的准确性，效率和公平参与
5. Michigan Private School Decision-Makers' Federal Funding Participation Decision and External Environmental Influences in Education. [D] . Ficaj, Margaret Y. 2011

机译：密歇根州私立学校决策者的联邦资助参与决策以及教育中的外部环境影响。
6. Clinician participation in CADTH’s pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review: contribution and impact on cancer drug funding recommendations [O] . M. Trudeau, P. Hoskins, T. Reiman, 2017

机译：临床医生参与CADTH的全加拿大肿瘤药物评论：对癌症药物资助建议的贡献和影响
7. 6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs [O] . Browman, George P., Manns, Braden, Hagen, Neil, 2008

机译：6-STEPPPs：促进临床医生参与资助新癌症药物的公平决策的模块化工具

6-STEPPPs: A Modular Tool to Facilitate Clinician Participation in Fair Decisions for Funding New Cancer Drugs

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅