首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Anus Rectum and Colon >Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal neoplasms: An observational study
【2h】

Short-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal neoplasms: An observational study

机译:内镜黏膜下剥离与腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的近期结果:一项观察性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: With endoscopic submucosal dissection and laparoscopic surgery, treatment for colorectal neoplasms has become minimally invasive. However, few studies have compared endoscopic submucosal dissection with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal neoplasms, excluding deeply invasive cancer on preoperative diagnosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients who had undergone endoscopic submucosal dissection or laparoscopic surgery for colorectal neoplasms between November 2005 and December 2015. We limited patients who were not suspected preoperatively to have aggressive submucosal invasion >1,000 μm. Results: Ninety-five patients underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection and 37 underwent laparoscopic surgery. Cases of endoscopic submucosal dissection tended to involve rectal neoplasms more often than colonic neoplasms, shorter operative times, and shorter lengths of hospital stay compared with laparoscopic surgery. The perforation rate during colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection in the early period (November 2005 to December 2010) and late period (January 2011 to December 2015) was 14.8% and 2.9%, respectively. In all cases of perforation during colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection, the ability to maneuver the endoscope was compromised. Though tumors were larger in patients who underwent rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection, the perforation and postoperative bleeding rates with rectal endoscopic submucosal dissection were both 3.2%. The most common indication for laparoscopic surgery was difficulty performing endoscopic submucosal dissection. Serious complications were rare. Conclusions: For colonic neoplasms, laparoscopic surgery should be considered when endoscopic submucosal dissection is technically difficult in the early period. For rectal neoplasms, endoscopic submucosal dissection is desirable even for those of large size.
机译:目的:通过内镜黏膜下剥离术和腹腔镜手术,结直肠肿瘤的治疗已成为微创治疗。然而,很少有研究将内镜黏膜下剥离术与腹腔镜手术对结直肠肿瘤进行比较,但在术前诊断中不包括深浸润性癌。方法:我们回顾性研究了2005年11月至2015年12月间接受内镜黏膜下剥离或腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠肿瘤的患者的资料。我们对术前未怀疑侵袭性黏膜下浸润> 1,000μm的患者进行了限制。结果:95例患者接受了内镜下粘膜下剥离术,37例接受了腹腔镜手术。与腹腔镜手术相比,内镜下粘膜下剥离术往往比结肠肿瘤更常涉及直肠肿瘤,手术时间更短,住院时间更短。早期(2005年11月至2010年12月)和晚期(2011年1月至2015年12月)结肠内窥镜黏膜下剥离术的穿孔率分别为14.8%和2.9%。在结肠内窥镜黏膜下剥离术中穿孔的所有情况下,操纵内窥镜的能力都会受到损害。尽管与结肠内镜下黏膜下剥离术相比,直肠内镜下黏膜下剥离术患者的肿瘤更大,但直肠内镜下黏膜下剥离术的穿孔率和术后出血率均为3.2%。腹腔镜手术最常见的适应症是内镜黏膜下剥离术。严重的并发症很少见。结论:对于结肠肿瘤,当内镜下黏膜下剥离在技术上较困难时,应考虑进行腹腔镜手术。对于直肠肿瘤,内镜下粘膜下剥离术即使对于大尺寸的肿瘤也是可取的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号