首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Irish Veterinary Journal >Dog bite injuries to humans and the use of breed-specific legislation: a comparison of bites from legislated and non-legislated dog breeds
【2h】

Dog bite injuries to humans and the use of breed-specific legislation: a comparison of bites from legislated and non-legislated dog breeds

机译:狗咬伤对人类的伤害和使用特定品种的立法:立法犬种和非立法犬种的咬伤比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe primary objective of this study was to investigate if differences in dog bite characteristics exist amongst legislated and non-legislated dog breeds listed under breed-specific legislation in Ireland (age when bitten, anatomical bite locations, triggers for biting, victim’s relationship with the dog, geographical location and owner presence, history of aggression, reporting bite incident to authorities, medical treatment required following the bite, and type of bite inflicted). A second objective of the current study was to investigate dog control officer’s enforcement and perceptions of current legislation. Data for statistical analyses were collated through a nationally advertised survey, with Pearson Chi-square and Fisher’s Exact Test statistical methods employed for analyses. A total of 140 incident surveys were assessed comprising of non-legislated (n = 100) and legislated (n = 40) dog bite incidents.
机译:背景这项研究的主要目的是调查爱尔兰特定品种立法中列出的立法犬种和非立法犬种之间是否存在犬咬特性的差异(被咬的年龄,被咬的解剖位置,咬人的诱因,受害人与狗的关系) ,地理位置和所有者的身分,侵略历史,向当局举报被咬事件,被咬后需要的医疗措施以及被咬的类型。本研究的第二个目标是调查狗只管制人员的执法情况和对当前法规的看法。用于统计分析的数据是通过在全国范围内进行的一项广告调查来整理的,其中采用了Pearson Chi-square和Fisher的Exact Test统计方法进行分析。总共评估了140次事件调查,包括非立法(n = 100)和立法(n = 40)狗咬事件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号