首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Exercise Science >Do the Principles of Motor Program Editing Apply to Longer Sequences of Rapid Aiming Movements? Part I
【2h】

Do the Principles of Motor Program Editing Apply to Longer Sequences of Rapid Aiming Movements? Part I

机译:运动程序编辑的原理是否适用于较长的快速瞄准运动序列?第一部分

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Prior work had shown that performing a shorter distance aiming movement prior to a longer distance aiming movement resulted in overshooting of the short movement and undershooting of the longer movement compared to repetition of the same movement. The main question was whether the same interference effects would be found in a three-movement sequence. Right-handed (N = 24) participants (aged 18–22) produced a sequence of two or three bimanual rapid lever reversals combining short (20°) and long (60°) movements with an intermovement interval of 2.5 s beginning with either the dominant or nondominant hand. Participants overshot the short target and undershot the long target when short and long movements alternated compared to same distance control conditions, but the effects were greater for the nondominant hand. Overall, the experiment demonstrated that parameter value switching was a major source of spatial inaccuracy in sequential aiming movements.
机译:先前的工作表明,与重复相同的动作相比,在进行较长距离的瞄准运动之前先执行较短的瞄准距离的动作会导致短距离动作的过冲,而较长距离的动作则过冲。主要问题是在三个运动序列中是否会发现相同的干扰效果。右撇子(N = 24)的参与者(18-22岁)产生了一系列的两到三个双向快速杠杆反转,结合了短时(20°)和长时(60°)的移动,间隔从2.5 s开始,从优势手或非优势手。与相同的距离控制条件相比,参与者在短距离和长距离交替运动时会超越短目标,而低于长目标,但对于非优势手则效果更大。总体而言,实验表明,参数值切换是连续瞄准运动中空间误差的主要来源。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号