首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Health Care Financing Review >Does one national prospective payment system market basket make sense?
【2h】

Does one national prospective payment system market basket make sense?

机译:一个全国性的预期付款系统市场篮子有意义吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

For the first 4 years of Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS), one national market basket of cost weights and price proxies has been used to update payment rates. Previous evidence for a single rate is reviewed, and more recent data are presented that show definite regional differences in input price inflation, resulting in systematic gains or losses for some regions. However, as long as the Health Care Financing Administration continues to periodically update its hospital wage index, the net impact on hospitals is minor. Nevertheless, large differences in PPS-excluded hospital cost shares indicate the need for two sets of cost weights.
机译:在Medicare的预期付款系统(PPS)的头四年中,使用了一个全国范围的成本权重和价格代理市场篮子来更新付款率。回顾了单一汇率的先前证据,并提供了更多最新数据,这些数据显示出输入价格通胀存在明显的地区差异,从而导致某些地区的系统损益。但是,只要卫生保健筹资管理局继续定期更新其医院工资指数,对医院的净影响就很小。但是,PPS排除的医院成本份额之间的巨大差异表明需要两组成本权重。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号