首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Psychology >Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice
【2h】

Walking the Plank: An Experimental Paradigm to Investigate Safety Voice

机译:走木板:调查安全声音的实验范式

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The investigation of people raising or withholding safety concerns, termed safety voice, has relied on report-based methodologies, with few experiments. Generalisable findings have been limited because: the behavioural nature of safety voice is rarely operationalised; the reliance on memory and recall has well-established biases; and determining causality requires experimentation. Across three studies, we introduce, evaluate and make available the first experimental paradigm for studying safety voice: the “Walking the plank” paradigm. This paradigm presents participants with an apparent hazard (walking across a weak wooden plank) to elicit safety voice behaviours, and it addresses the methodological shortfalls of report-based methodologies. Study 1 (n = 129) demonstrated that the paradigm can elicit observable safety voice behaviours in a safe, controlled and randomised laboratory environment. Study 2 (n = 69) indicated it is possible to elicit safety silence for a single hazard when safety concerns are assessed and alternative ways to address the hazard are absent. Study 3 (n = 75) revealed that manipulating risk perceptions results in changes to safety voice behaviours. We propose a distinction between two independent dimensions (concerned-unconcerned and voice-silence) which yields a 2 × 2 safety voice typology. Demonstrating the need for experimental investigations of safety voice, the results found a consistent mismatch between self-reported and observed safety voice. The discussion examines insights on conceptualising and operationalising safety voice behaviours in relationship to safety concerns, and suggests new areas for research: replicating empirical studies, understanding the behavioural nature of safety voice, clarifying the personal relevance of physical harm, and integrating safety voice with other harm-prevention behaviours. Our article adds to the conceptual strength of the safety voice literature and provides a methodology and typology for experimentally examining people raising safety concerns.
机译:对人们提出或隐瞒安全问题的调查(称为安全声音)依赖于基于报告的方法,很少进行实验。可概括的发现受到限制是因为:安全声音的行为本质很少被实施;对记忆和回忆的依赖有公认的偏见;确定因果关系需要进行实验。在三项研究中,我们介绍,评估并提供了第一种用于研究安全语音的实验范式:“走木板”范式。该范式给参与者带来了明显的危险(走过一块软木板)以引发安全语音行为,并且解决了基于报告的方法论的方法论缺陷。研究1(n = 129)表明,该范例可以在安全,受控和随机的实验室环境中引发可观察到的安全语音行为。研究2(n = 69)指出,当评估安全隐患而又没有解决危险的替代方法时,有可能引起单一危险的安全沉默。研究3(n = 75)表明,操纵风险感知会导致安全语音行为发生变化。我们建议在两个独立的维度(关注的无关和语音沉默)之间进行区分,从而产生2×2安全语音类型。证明需要对安全语音进行实验研究,结果发现自我报告的和观察到的安全语音之间存在一致的不匹配。讨论探讨了与安全隐患有关的概念化和安全语音行为的可操作性的见解,并提出了新的研究领域:复制经验研究,了解安全语音的行为性质,阐明人身伤害的个人相关性以及将安全语音与其他人整合预防危害的行为。我们的文章增加了安全声音文献的概念强度,并提供了一种方法和类型学,用于通过实验检查提出安全问题的人员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号