首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Frontiers in Endocrinology >GnRH Agonist Trigger and LH Activity Luteal Phase Support versus hCG Trigger and Conventional Luteal Phase Support in Fresh Embryo Transfer IVF/ICSI Cycles—A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-analysis
【2h】

GnRH Agonist Trigger and LH Activity Luteal Phase Support versus hCG Trigger and Conventional Luteal Phase Support in Fresh Embryo Transfer IVF/ICSI Cycles—A Systematic PRISMA Review and Meta-analysis

机译:GnRH激动剂触发和LH活性黄体支持与hCG触发和常规黄体支持在新鲜胚胎移植IVF / ICSI周期中的比较-系统的PRISMA审查和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionThe use of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) for final oocyte maturation trigger in oocyte donation and elective frozen embryo transfer cycles is well established due to lower ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates as compared to hCG trigger. A recent Cochrane meta-analysis concluded that GnRHa trigger was associated with reduced live birth rates (LBRs) in fresh autologous IVF cycles compared to hCG trigger. However, the evidence is not unequivocal, and recent trials have found encouraging reproductive outcomes among couples undergoing GnRHa trigger and individualized luteal LH activity support. Thus, the aim was to compare GnRHa trigger followed by luteal LH activity support with hCG trigger in IVF patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer.
机译:简介由于与hCG触发相比较低的卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率,在卵母细胞捐赠和选择性冷冻胚胎移植周期中使用GnRH激动剂(GnRHa)进行最终卵母细胞成熟触发已得到充分确立。最近的一项Cochrane荟萃分析得出的结论是,与hCG触发相比,新的自体IVF周期中GnRHa触发与活产率(LBR)降低有关。但是,证据并非明确,最近的试验发现,接受GnRHa触发和个体黄体LH活性支持的夫妇的生殖结果令人鼓舞。因此,目的是比较接受新鲜胚胎移植的IVF患者中GnRHa触发,黄体LH活动支持与hCG触发的比较。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号