首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Filaria Journal >Assessment of vector/host contact: comparison of animal-baited traps and UV-light/suction trap for collecting Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors of Orbiviruses
【2h】

Assessment of vector/host contact: comparison of animal-baited traps and UV-light/suction trap for collecting Culicoides biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) vectors of Orbiviruses

机译:媒介/宿主接触的评估:比较动物诱饵捕集器和紫外线/吸捕器以收集库蚊咬咬的ges(双翅目:Ceratopogonidae)Orbiviruses的媒介

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe emergence and massive spread of bluetongue in Western Europe during 2006-2008 had disastrous consequences for sheep and cattle production and confirmed the ability of Palaearctic Culicoides (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) to transmit the virus. Some aspects of Culicoides ecology, especially host-seeking and feeding behaviors, remain insufficiently described due to the difficulty of collecting them directly on a bait animal, the most reliable method to evaluate biting rates.Our aim was to compare typical animal-baited traps (drop trap and direct aspiration) to both a new sticky cover trap and a UV-light/suction trap (the most commonly used method to collect Culicoides).
机译:背景2006年至2008年期间,蓝舌病在西欧的出现和大规模传播给绵羊和牛的生产造成了灾难性的后果,并证实了古古鳄(Diptera:Ceratopogonidae)能够传播这种病毒。由于难以直接将它们收集到诱饵动物上,这是评估咬食率的最可靠方法,因此Culicoides生态学的某些方面(尤其是寄主和摄食行为)仍然缺乏足够的描述。我们的目的是比较典型的动物诱饵陷阱(液滴捕集器和直接抽吸法)到新的粘性覆盖物捕集器和紫外线/吸气捕集器(最常用的收集葫芦科植物的方法)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号