首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>eNeuro >Compromised NMDA/Glutamate Receptor Expression in Dopaminergic Neurons Impairs Instrumental Learning, But Not Pavlovian Goal Tracking or Sign Tracking
【2h】

Compromised NMDA/Glutamate Receptor Expression in Dopaminergic Neurons Impairs Instrumental Learning, But Not Pavlovian Goal Tracking or Sign Tracking

机译:多巴胺能神经元中受损的NMDA /谷氨酸受体表达会损害仪器学习,但不会影响帕夫洛夫目标追踪或体征追踪

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two theories regarding the role for dopamine neurons in learning include the concepts that their activity serves as a (1) mechanism that confers incentive salience onto rewards and associated cues and/or (2) contingency teaching signal reflecting reward prediction error. While both theories are provocative, the causal role for dopamine cell activity in either mechanism remains controversial. In this study mice that either fully or partially lacked NMDARs in dopamine neurons exclusively, as well as appropriate controls, were evaluated for reward-related learning; this experimental design allowed for a test of the premise that NMDA/glutamate receptor (NMDAR)-mediated mechanisms in dopamine neurons, including NMDA-dependent regulation of phasic discharge activity of these cells, modulate either the instrumental learning processes or the likelihood of pavlovian cues to become highly motivating incentive stimuli that directly attract behavior. Loss of NMDARs in dopamine neurons did not significantly affect baseline dopamine utilization in the striatum, novelty evoked locomotor behavior, or consumption of a freely available, palatable food solution. On the other hand, animals lacking NMDARs in dopamine cells exhibited a selective reduction in reinforced lever responses that emerged over the course of instrumental learning. Loss of receptor expression did not, however, influence the likelihood of an animal acquiring a pavlovian conditional response associated with attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired cues (sign tracking). These data support the view that reductions in NMDAR signaling in dopamine neurons affect instrumental reward-related learning but do not lend support to hypotheses that suggest that the behavioral significance of this signaling includes incentive salience attribution.
机译:关于多巴胺神经元在学习中的作用的两种理论包括以下概念:它们的活动充当(1)将奖励显着性赋予奖励和相关线索的机制,和/或(2)反映奖励预测错误的应急教学信号。虽然这两种理论都具有启发性,但在任一机制中多巴胺细胞活性的因果作用仍存在争议。在这项研究中,对完全或部分缺乏多巴胺神经元NMDARs的小鼠以及适当的对照进行了与奖赏相关的学习的评估。此实验设计允许对以下前提进行测试:多巴胺神经元中NMDA /谷氨酸受体(NMDAR)介导的机制,包括这些细胞的相放电活性的NMDA依赖性调节,可调节仪器学习过程或巴甫洛夫信号的可能性成为直接吸引行为的高度激励性的刺激。多巴胺神经元中NMDAR的丢失不会显着影响纹状体中基线多巴胺的利用,新颖性引起的运动行为或食用可自由使用的可口食物溶液。另一方面,在多巴胺细胞中缺乏NMDAR的动物在工具学习过程中选择性增强了增强的杠杆反应。但是,受体表达的丧失并不会影响动物获得与激励显着性归因于奖励配对线索(符号跟踪)相关的帕夫洛夫式条件反应的可能性。这些数据支持这样的观点,即多巴胺神经元中NMDAR信号的减少会影响与工具性奖励相关的学习,但并不能为以下假说提供支持,这些假说表明该信号的行为意义包括激励显着性归因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号