首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >A comparison of the accuracy of iTRAQ quantification by nLC-ESI MSMS and nLC-MALDI MSMS methods
【2h】

A comparison of the accuracy of iTRAQ quantification by nLC-ESI MSMS and nLC-MALDI MSMS methods

机译:通过nLC-ESI MSMS和nLC-MALDI MSMS方法对iTRAQ定量的准确性进行比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The accuracy of quantification obtained using the iTRAQ labelling methodology for measuring protein ratios more extreme than 1:1 was investigated. A comparison of nLC-ESI MSMS and nLC-MALDI MSMS analysis routes was performed. A fixed concentration of a standard six protein mix was spiked with two proteins at a range of concentrations. The two data analysis programmes, Mascot and ProteinPilot Paragon, were also compared. Whilst the lower ratios could be measured accurately, greater discrepancies were seen for the higher ratios, particularly by nLC-ESI MSMS. Filtering out the weaker reporter ion signals improved the accuracy of the ratios: this is likely due to several factors which are explored in more detail. Overall, analysis by nLC-MALDI MSMS followed by Mascot interpretation gave the most accurate results.
机译:研究了使用iTRAQ标记方法测得的蛋白质比例超过1:1的定量准确性。进行了nLC-ESI MSMS和nLC-MALDI MSMS分析路线的比较。将固定浓度的标准六种蛋白质混合物掺入两种浓度范围内的蛋白质。还对两个数据分析程序Mascot和ProteinPilot Paragon进行了比较。尽管可以准确地测量出较低的比率,但是对于较高的比率,尤其是通过nLC-ESI MSMS,发现差异更大。滤除较弱的报告离子信号可提高比率的准确性:这可能是由于一些因素所致,这些因素将得到更详细的探讨。总体而言,通过nLC-MALDI MSMS进行的分析以及随后的Mascot解释给出了最准确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号