首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research
【2h】

Fresh or frozen? Classifying ‘spare’ embryos for donation to human embryonic stem cell research

机译:新鲜还是冷冻?将备用胚胎分类以捐赠给人类胚胎干细胞研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

United Kingdom (UK) funding to build human embryonic stem cell (hESC) derivation labs within assisted conception units (ACU) was intended to facilitate the ‘In-vitro fertilisation (IVF)-stem cell interface’, including the flow of fresh ‘spare’ embryos to stem cell labs. However, in the three sites reported on here, which received this funding, most of the embryos used for hESC research came from long term cryopreservation storage and/or outside clinics. In this paper we explore some of the clinical, technical, social and ethical factors that might help to explain this situation. We report from our qualitative study of the ethical frameworks for approaching women/couples for donation of embryos to stem cell research. Members of staff took part in 44 interviews and six ethics discussion groups held at our study sites between February 2008 and October 2009. We focus here on their articulations of social and ethical, as well as scientific, dimensions in the contingent classification of ‘spare’ embryos, entailing uncertainty, fluidity and naturalisation in classifying work. Social and ethical factors include acknowledging and responding to uncertainty in classifying embryos; retaining ‘fluidity’ in the grading system to give embryos ‘every chance’; tensions between standardisation and variation in enacting a ‘fair’ grading system; enhancement of patient choice and control, and prevention of regret; and incorporation of patients’ values in construction of ethically acceptable embryo ‘spareness’ (‘frozen’ embryos, and embryos determined through preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) to be genetically ‘affected’). We argue that the success of the ‘built moral environment’ of ACU with adjoining stem cell laboratories building projects intended to facilitate the ‘IVF-stem cell interface’ may depend not only on architecture, but also on the part such social and ethical factors play in configuration of embryos as particular kinds of moral work objects.
机译:英国(UK)资助在辅助受孕单位(ACU)内建立人类胚胎干细胞(hESC)衍生实验室,旨在促进“体外受精(IVF)-干细胞接口”,包括新鲜的“备用”胚胎干细胞实验室。但是,在这里报道的获得这笔资金的三个地点中,用于hESC研究的大多数胚胎来自长期冷冻保存和/或外部诊所。在本文中,我们探讨了可能有助于解释这种情况的一些临床,技术,社会和道德因素。我们从定性研究中对与妇女/夫妇接触以向干细胞研究捐赠胚胎的伦理框架进行了报告。在2008年2月至2009年10月期间,我们的工作人员参加了在我们研究地点举行的44次面试和六个道德讨论小组。在此,我们将重点放在他们对“备用”或然分类中社会和道德以及科学维度的阐述上。胚胎,在分类工作中需要不确定性,流动性和归化。社会和道德因素包括对胚胎分类的不确定性的承认和回应;在分级系统中保留“流动性”,使胚胎具有“一切机会”;在制定“公平”的评分系统时,标准化与变更之间存在紧张关系;加强患者的选择和控制,防止后悔;并将患者的价值观纳入道德上可接受的胚胎“备用”(“冷冻”胚胎,以及通过植入前遗传学诊断(PGD)确定为在基因上“受影响”的胚胎)中。我们认为,ACU的“建立道德环境”的成功与旨在促进“ IVF-干细胞界面”的相邻干细胞实验室建设项目的成功可能不仅取决于架构,而且还取决于这些社会和道德因素发挥的作用在胚胎构造中作为特殊的道德工作对象。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号