首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Effect of DNA extraction procedure repeated extraction and ethidium monoazide (EMA)/propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment on overall DNA yield and impact on microbial fingerprints for bacteria fungi and archaea in a reference soil
【2h】

Effect of DNA extraction procedure repeated extraction and ethidium monoazide (EMA)/propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment on overall DNA yield and impact on microbial fingerprints for bacteria fungi and archaea in a reference soil

机译:DNA提取程序重复提取和单叠氮化乙锭(EMA)/单叠氮化丙啶(PMA)处理对参考土壤中细菌真菌和古细菌微生物总指纹的影响以及对微生物指纹的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Different DNA extraction protocols were evaluated on a reference soil. A wide difference was found in the total extractable DNA as derived from different extraction protocols. Concerning the DNA yield phenol–chloroform–isomyl alcohol extraction resulted in high DNA yield but also in a remarkable co-extraction of contaminants making PCR from undiluted DNA extracts impossible. By comparison of two different extraction kits, the Macherey&Nagel SoilExtract II kit resulted in the highest DNA yields when buffer SL1 and the enhancer solution were applied. The enhancer solution not only significantly increased the DNA yield but also the amount of co-extracted contaminates, whereas additional disintegration strategies did not. Although a three times repeated DNA extraction increased the total amount of extracted DNA, microbial fingerprints were merely affected. However, with the 5th extraction this changed. A reduction of total DGGE band numbers was observed for archaea and fungi, whereas for bacteria the diversity increased. The application of ethidium monoazide (EMA) or propidium monoazide (PMA) treatment aiming on the selective removal of soil DNA derived from cells lacking cell wall integrity resulted in a significant reduction of total extracted DNA, however, the hypothesized effect on microbial fingerprints failed to appear indicating the need for further investigations.
机译:在参考土壤上评估了不同的DNA提取方案。发现来自不同提取方案的总可提取DNA差异很大。关于DNA的产率苯酚-氯仿-异戊醇的萃取不仅可以提高DNA的产率,而且还可以显着地共萃取污染物,使得从未稀释的DNA萃取物中进行PCR成为不可能。通过比较两种不同的提取试剂盒,使用缓冲液SL1和增强剂溶液时,Macherey&Nagel SoilExtract II试剂盒可产生最高的DNA产量。增强剂溶液不仅显着提高了DNA产量,而且还增加了共提取的污染物数量,而其他的分解策略则没有。尽管重复提取三遍DNA可以增加提取DNA的总量,但微生物指纹仅受到影响。但是,随着第5次提取,情况发生了变化。观察到古细菌和真菌的总DGGE带数减少,而细菌的多样性增加。单叠氮化乙锭(EMA)或单叠氮化丙锭(PMA)处理的应用旨在选择性去除缺乏细胞壁完整性的细胞衍生的土壤DNA,导致提取的总DNA显着减少,但是,对微生物指纹的假设影响未能实现出现,表明需要进一步调查。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号