首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >No time for drifting: Comparing performance and applicability of signal detrending algorithms for real-time fMRI
【2h】

No time for drifting: Comparing performance and applicability of signal detrending algorithms for real-time fMRI

机译:无需花时间:比较用于实时功能磁共振成像的信号去趋势算法的性能和适用性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As a consequence of recent technological advances in the field of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), results can now be made available in real-time. This allows for novel applications such as online quality assurance of the acquisition, intra-operative fMRI, brain-computer-interfaces, and neurofeedback. To that aim, signal processing algorithms for real-time fMRI must reliably correct signal contaminations due to physiological noise, head motion, and scanner drift. The aim of this study was to compare performance of the commonly used online detrending algorithms exponential moving average (EMA), incremental general linear model (iGLM) and sliding window iGLM (iGLMwindow). For comparison, we also included offline detrending algorithms (i.e., MATLAB's and SPM8's native detrending functions). Additionally, we optimized the EMA control parameter, by assessing the algorithm's performance on a simulated data set with an exhaustive set of realistic experimental design parameters. First, we optimized the free parameters of the online and offline detrending algorithms. Next, using simulated data, we systematically compared the performance of the algorithms with respect to varying levels of Gaussian and colored noise, linear and non-linear drifts, spikes, and step function artifacts. Additionally, using in vivo data from an actual rt-fMRI experiment, we validated our results in a post hoc offline comparison of the different detrending algorithms. Quantitative measures show that all algorithms perform well, even though they are differently affected by the different artifact types. The iGLM approach outperforms the other online algorithms and achieves online detrending performance that is as good as that of offline procedures. These results may guide developers and users of real-time fMRI analyses tools to best account for the problem of signal drifts in real-time fMRI.
机译:由于功能磁共振成像(fMRI)领域的最新技术进步,现在可以实时获得结果。这允许进行新颖的应用,例如采集的在线质量保证,术中功能磁共振成像,脑计算机接口和神经反馈。为此,用于实时功能磁共振成像的信号处理算法必须可靠地校正由于生理噪声,头部运动和扫描仪漂移而引起的信号污染。这项研究的目的是比较常用的在线去趋势算法指数移动平均(EMA),增量通用线性模型(iGLM)和滑动窗口iGLM(iGLM window )的性能。为了进行比较,我们还包含了离线趋势消除算法(即MATLAB和SPM8的本机趋势消除函数)。此外,我们通过评估一组具有现实意义的实验设计参数的模拟数据集的算法性能,优化了EMA控制参数。首先,我们优化了在线和离线趋势消除算法的自由参数。接下来,使用模拟数据,针对高斯和彩色噪声的变化水平,线性和非线性漂移,尖峰和阶跃函数伪像,系统地比较了算法的性能。此外,我们使用来自实际rt-fMRI实验的体内数据,在不同脱趋势算法的事后离线比较中验证了我们的结果。定量测量表明,即使它们受不同工件类型的影响不同,所有算法也都表现良好。 iGLM方法优于其他在线算法,并实现了与脱机过程一样好的在线去趋势性能。这些结果可能指导实时功能磁共振成像分析工具的开发人员和用户更好地解决实时功能磁共振成像中的信号漂移问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号