首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Elsevier Sponsored Documents >Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how
【2h】

Title: Can changing the physical environment promote walking and cycling? A systematic review of what works and how

机译:标题:改变身体环境可以促进步行和骑自行车吗?对什么起作用以及如何起作用的系统评价

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Environmental changes aimed at encouraging walking or cycling may promote activity and improve health, but evidence suggests small or inconsistent effects in practice. Understanding how an intervention works might help explain the effects observed and provide guidance about generalisability. We therefore aimed to review the literature on the effects of this type of intervention and to understand how and why these may or may not be effective. We searched eight electronic databases for existing systematic reviews and mined these for evaluative studies of physical environmental changes and assessed changes in walking, cycling or physical activity. We then searched for related sources including quantitative or qualitative studies, policy documents or reports. We extracted information on the evidence for effects (‘estimation’), contexts and mechanisms (‘explanation’) and assessed credibility, and synthesised material narratively. We identified 13 evaluations of interventions specifically targeting walking and cycling and used 46 related sources. 70% (n = 9 evaluations) scored 3 or less on the credibility criteria for effectiveness. 6 reported significant positive effects, but higher quality evaluations were more likely to report positive effects. Only two studies provided rich evidence of mechanisms. We identified three common resources that interventions provide to promote walking and cycling: (i) improving accessibility and connectivity; (ii) improving traffic and personal safety; and (iii) improving the experience of walking and cycling. The most effective interventions appeared to target accessibility and safety in both supportive and unsupportive contexts. Although the evidence base was relatively limited, we were able to understand the role of context in the success of interventions. Researchers and policy makers should consider the context and mechanisms which might operate before evaluating and implementing interventions.
机译:旨在鼓励步行或骑自行车的环境变化可能会促进活动并改善健康状况,但有证据表明在实践中影响很小或不一致。了解干预措施的工作方式可能有助于解释观察到的效果,并提供有关泛化性的指导。因此,我们旨在回顾有关此类干预效果的文献,并了解这些效果如何以及为何有效或无效。我们搜索了八个电子数据库以进行现有的系统评价,并将其挖掘出来以进行物理环境变化的评估研究,并评估步行,骑自行车或体育锻炼的变化。然后,我们搜索了相关来源,包括定量或定性研究,政策文件或报告。我们提取了有关效果证据(“估计”),上下文和机制(“解释”)的信息,并评估了可信度,并通过叙事方式合成了材料。我们确定了13项针对步行和骑自行车的干预措施的评估,并使用了46种相关来源。 70%(n = 9项评估)的有效性可信度标准得分为3分或更低。 6个报告有明显的积极影响,但更高质量的评估更有可能报告积极影响。只有两项研究提供了丰富的机制证据。我们确定了干预措施可提供的三种常见资源,以促进步行和骑自行车:(i)改善可及性和连通性; (ii)改善交通和人身安全; (iii)改善步行和骑自行车的经验。在支持和不支持的情况下,最有效的干预措施似乎都针对可及性和安全性。尽管证据基础相对有限,但我们能够理解情境在干预成功中的作用。研究人员和政策制定者应在评估和实施干预措施之前考虑可能发生的情况和机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号