首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Clinician Perspectives of Barriers to Effective Implementation of a Rapid Response System in an Academic Health Centre: A Focus Group Study
【2h】

Clinician Perspectives of Barriers to Effective Implementation of a Rapid Response System in an Academic Health Centre: A Focus Group Study

机译:在学术健康中心有效实施快速反应系统的障碍的临床医生观点:焦点小组研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Systemic and structural issues of rapid response system (RRS) models can hinder implementation. This study sought to understand the ways in which acute care clinicians (physicians and nurses) experience and negotiate care for deteriorating patients within the RRS. >Methods: Physicians and nurses working within an Australian academic health centre within a jurisdictional-based model of clinical governance participated in focus group interviews. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using thematic content analysis. >Results: Thirty-four participants (21 physicians and 13 registered nurses [RNs]) participated in six focus groups over five weeks in 2014. Implementing the RRS in daily practice was a process of informal communication and negotiation in spite of standardised protocols. Themes highlighted several systems or organisational-level barriers to an effective RRS, including (1) responsibility is inversely proportional to clinical experience; (2) actions around system flexibility contribute to deviation from protocol; (3) misdistribution of resources leads to perceptions of inadequate staffing levels inhibiting full optimisation of the RRS; and (4) poor communication and documentation of RRS increases clinician workloads. >Conclusion: Implementing a RRS is complex and multifactorial, influenced by various inter- and intra-professional factors, staffing models and organisational culture. The RRS is not a static model; it is both reflexive and iterative, perpetually transforming to meet healthcare consumer and provider demands and local unit contexts and needs. Requiring more than just a strong initial implementation phase, new models of care such as a RRS demand good governance processes, ongoing support and regular evaluation and refinement. Cultural, organizational and professional factors, as well as systems-based processes, require consideration if RRSs are to achieve their intended outcomes in dynamic healthcare settings
机译:>背景:快速响应系统(RRS)模型的系统性和结构性问题可能会阻碍实施。这项研究试图了解急性护理临床医生(内科医生和护士)体验和协商在RRS内恶化患者的护理方式。 >方法:在澳大利亚学术健康中心内,在以辖区为基础的临床治理模式下工作的内科医生和护士参加了焦点小组访谈。使用主题内容分析来分析逐字记录。 >结果: 2014年,三位参与者(21位医生和13位注册护士[RN])在六个星期内参加了六个焦点小组讨论。在日常实践中实施RRS是非正式沟通和协商的过程。尽管有标准化的协议。主题强调了有效RRS的几个系统或组织层面的障碍,其中包括:(1)责任与临床经验成反比; (2)围绕系统灵活性采取的措施导致偏离协议; (3)资源分配不当导致人们认识到人员配备不足,从而无法充分优化RRS; (4)RRS的沟通和记录不佳会增加临床医生的工作量。 >结论:实施RRS的过程是复杂且多因素的,受各种行业内和行业内因素,人员配备模型和组织文化的影响。 RRS不是静态模型。它既具有反射性又具有迭代性,可以不断进行转换以满足医疗保健消费者和提供者的需求以及当地单位环境和需求。 RRS之类的新护理模式不仅需要强大的初始实施阶段,还需要良好的治理流程,持续的支持以及定期评估和完善。如果RRS要在动态医疗保​​健环境中实现其预期结果,则需要考虑文化,组织和专业因素以及基于系统的流程

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号