【2h】

Complex Leadership in Healthcare: A Scoping Review

机译:医疗保健领域的复杂领导力:范围界定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Nowadays, health systems are generally acknowledged to be complex social systems. Consequently, scholars, academics, practitioners, and policy-makers are exploring how to adopt a complexity perspective in health policy and system research. While leadership and complexity has been studied extensively outside health, the implications of complexity theories for the study of leadership in healthcare have received limited attention. We carried out a scoping review of complex leadership (CL) in healthcare to investigate how CL in healthcare has been defined, theorised and conceptualised and to explore how ‘CL’ has been applied in healthcare settings. >Methods: We followed the methodological steps proposed by (Arksey and O’Malley, 2005): (1) specifying the research question, (2) identifying relevant studies, (3) study selection, (4) charting the data, (5) collating and summarizing the findings, and (6) reporting the results. We searched using Medline, Psychinfo, Wiley online library, and Google Scholar. Our inclusion criteria were: publication type (peer reviewed articles, theses, and book chapters); phenomenon of interest: complex leadership; context: healthcare and period of publication: between 2000 and 2016. >Results: Our search and selection resulted in 37 papers (16 conceptual papers, 14 empirical studies and 7 advocacy papers). We note that empirical studies on CL are few and almost all research reported by these papers was carried out in the North (mainly in USA and UK). We found that there is some variation in definitions of CL. Furthermore, the research papers adopt mostly an explorative or explanatory approach and do not focus on assessing effectiveness of CL approaches. Finally, we found that the majority of researchers seem to adhere to the mathematical complexity perspective. >Conclusion: Complexity concepts derived from natural sciences may not automatically fit management of health services. Further research into how social complexity theories may offer researchers useful grounds to empirically test CL theories in health settings is warranted. Specific attention should be paid to the multi-layered nature of leadership.
机译:>背景:如今,人们普遍认为卫生系统是复杂的社会系统。因此,学者,学者,医生和政策制定者正在探索如何在卫生政策和系统研究中采用复杂性观点。尽管领导力和复杂性已在健康领域之外进行了广泛的研究,但是复杂性理论对医疗保健领导力研究的意义受到了有限的关注。我们对医疗保健中的复杂领导力(CL)进行了范围界定审查,以调查医疗保健中的CL的定义,理论和概念化方式,并探讨“ CL”如何应用于医疗保健环境。 >方法:我们遵循了(Arksey and O'Malley,2005)提出的方法步骤:(1)指定研究问题;(2)识别相关研究;(3)选择研究;(4)绘制数据图表;(5)整理和总结调查结果;(6)报告结果。我们使用Medline,Psychinfo,Wiley在线图书馆和Google Scholar搜索。我们的收录标准是:出版物类型(同行评审的文章,论文和书籍章节);兴趣现象:复杂的领导;背景:医疗保健和出版时间:2000年至2016年。>结果:我们的搜索和选择结果包括37篇论文(16篇概念性论文,14篇实证研究和7篇倡导性论文)。我们注意到关于CL的实证研究很少,这些论文报道的几乎所有研究都是在北部(主要在美国和英国)进行的。我们发现CL的定义有些变化。此外,研究论文大多采用探索性或解释性方法,而不着重于评估CL方法的有效性。最后,我们发现大多数研究人员似乎都坚持数学复杂性的观点。 >结论:源自自然科学的复杂性概念可能无法自动适应卫生服务的管理。有必要进一步研究社会复杂性理论如何为研究人员提供有用的依据,以在健康环境中对CL理论进行经验检验。应特别注意领导的多层性质。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号