首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Policy and Management >Key Ethical Issues Discussed at CDC-Sponsored International Regional Meetings to Explore Cultural Perspectives and Contexts on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response
【2h】

Key Ethical Issues Discussed at CDC-Sponsored International Regional Meetings to Explore Cultural Perspectives and Contexts on Pandemic Influenza Preparedness and Response

机译:在疾病预防控制中心主办的国际区域会议上讨论的主要伦理问题以探讨大流行性流感的防范和应对的文化观点和背景

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Recognizing the importance of having a broad exploration of how cultural perspectives may shape thinking about ethical considerations, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funded four regional meetings in Africa, Asia, Latin America, and the Eastern Mediterranean to explore these perspectives relevant to pandemic influenza preparedness and response. The meetings were attended by 168 health professionals, scientists, academics, ethicists, religious leaders, and other community members representing 40 countries in these regions. >Methods: We reviewed the meeting reports, notes and stories and mapped outcomes to the key ethical challenges for pandemic influenza response described in the World Health Organization’s (WHO’s) guidance, Ethical Considerations in Developing a Public Health Response to Pandemic Influenza: transparency and public engagement, allocation of resources, social distancing, obligations to and of healthcare workers, and international collaboration. >Results: The important role of transparency and public engagement were widely accepted among participants. However, there was general agreement that no "one size fits all" approach to allocating resources can address the variety of economic, cultural and other contextual factors that must be taken into account. The importance of social distancing as a tool to limit disease transmission was also recognized, but the difficulties associated with this measure were acknowledged. There was agreement that healthcare workers often have competing obligations and that government has a responsibility to assist healthcare workers in doing their job by providing appropriate training and equipment. Finally, there was agreement about the importance of international collaboration for combating global health threats. >Conclusion: Although some cultural differences in the values that frame pandemic preparedness and response efforts were observed, participants generally agreed on the key ethical principles discussed in the WHO’s guidance. Most significantly the input gathered from these regional meetings pointed to the important role that procedural ethics can play in bringing people and countries together to respond to the shared health threat posed by a pandemic influenza despite the existence of cultural differences.
机译:>背景:认识到广泛探讨文化观点如何影响伦理考量的重要性,疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)资助了在非洲,亚洲,拉丁美洲,和地中海东部地区来探索与大流行性流感的防范和应对有关的这些观点。代表这些地区40个国家的168名卫生专业人员,科学家,学者,伦理学家,宗教领袖和其他社区成员参加了会议。 >方法:我们审查了会议报告,笔记和故事,并对世界卫生组织(WHO)指南《制定公共卫生对策的道德考虑》中描述的应对大流行性流感应对的关键道德挑战绘制了结果。大流行性流感:透明度和公众参与,资源分配,社会距离,医护人员的义务和国际合作。 >结果:透明度和公众参与的重要作用在参与者中被广泛接受。但是,人们普遍认为,没有一种“万能的”分配资源的方法可以解决必须考虑的各种经济,文化和其他背景因素。人们也认识到,远离社会作为限制疾病传播的工具的重要性,但也认识到与这一措施相关的困难。已经达成共识,医护人员经常承担相互竞争的义务,政府有责任通过提供适当的培训和设备来协助医护人员完成工作。最后,关于国际合作对战胜全球健康威胁的重要性的共识。 >结论:尽管观察到在大流行防范和应对工作的价值观上存在一些文化差异,但与会人员普遍同意WHO指南中讨论的关键道德原则。这些区域会议收集的意见最重要地表明,尽管存在文化差异,但程序伦理可以在使人民和国家团结起来应对大流行性流感造成的共同健康威胁方面发挥重要作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号