首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Health Sciences >Objective structured brainstorming questions (OSBQs) in PBL tutorial sessions: Evidence based pilot study
【2h】

Objective structured brainstorming questions (OSBQs) in PBL tutorial sessions: Evidence based pilot study

机译:PBL辅导课程中的客观结构化头脑风暴问题(OSBQ):基于证据的试点研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The fact that faculty tutors do have different backgrounds and specialty has been a concern as a factor that contributes to disparity in the delivery of brainstorming session outcomes. This paper aims to introduce >a road map in the form of a set of focused objective structured questions >(OSBQs) for tutors to follow in brainstorming.MethodsObjectively structured questions were generated by the block planning committees. A pilot study was conducted from February 2008 – March 2009 and included groups (44 students) of second and third year undergraduate students of the Faculty of Medicine, King Fahad Medical City. Four indicators were considered to check the validity of the proposed OSBQs; (i) feed back on the perception of medical students experiencing different types of tutorial sessions, (ii) learning objectives achieved under both systems, (iii) student’s performance under the OSBQs and the unguided tutorials and (iv) proper utilization of the time allocated to brainstorming sessions.
机译:教员的确具有不同的背景和专业这一事实已引起人们的关注,因为这是导致头脑风暴会议成果交付差距的一个因素。本文旨在以一套针对性的目标结构化问题>(OSBQs)的形式介绍>路线图,供教师在头脑风暴中遵循。方法街区规划委员会。从2008年2月至2009年3月进行了一项试点研究,研究对象为法哈德国王医学城医学院第二和第三年本科生(44名学生)。考虑了四个指标以检查拟议的OSBQ的有效性; (i)反馈医学生经历不同类型的辅导课程的感觉,(ii)在两种系统下均达到的学习目标,(iii)在OSBQ和无指导的辅导课程下学生的表现,以及(iv)合理利用分配的时间进行头脑风暴会议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号