首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Medical Sciences >Comparative study of control selection in a national population-based case-control study: Estimating risk of smoking on cancer deaths in Chinese men
【2h】

Comparative study of control selection in a national population-based case-control study: Estimating risk of smoking on cancer deaths in Chinese men

机译:一项基于全国人群的病例对照研究中对照选择的比较研究:估计吸烟对中国男性癌症死亡的风险

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: To assess the validation of a novel control selection design by comparing the consistency between the new design and a routine design in a large case-control study that was incorporated into a nationwide mortality survey in China.>Methods: A nationwide mortality study was conducted during 1989-1991. Surviving spouses or other relatives of all adults who died during 1986-1988 provided detailed information about their own as well as the deceased person's smoking history. In this study, 130,079 males who died of various smoking-related cancers at age 35 or over were taken as cases, while 103,248 male surviving spouses (same age range with cases) of women who died during the same period and 49,331 males who died from causes other than those related to smoking were used as control group 1 and control group 2, respectively. Consistency in the results when comparing cases with each of the control groups was assessed.>Results: Consistency in the results was observed in the analyses using different control groups although cancer deaths varied with region and age. Equivalence could be ascertained using a 15% criterion in most cancer deaths which had high death rates in urban areas, but they were uncertain for most cancers in rural areas irrespective of whether the hypothesis testing showed significant differences or not.>Conclusions: Sex-matched living spouse control design as an alternative control selection for a case-control study is valid and feasible, and the basic principles of the equivalence study are also supported by epidemiological survey data.
机译:>目的:在一项纳入中国全国死亡率调查的大型病例对照研究中,通过比较新设计与常规设计之间的一致性来评估新型对照选择设计的有效性。 strong>方法:在1989-1991年期间进行了全国范围的死亡率研究。 1986年至1988年死亡的所有成年人的尚存配偶或其他亲属提供了有关其本人以及死者吸烟史的详细信息。在这项研究中,以130,079名在35岁或35岁以上死于各种与吸烟有关的癌症的男性为例,而同期死亡的103,248名男性幸存配偶(年龄相同)的女性和49,331名男性死于将与吸烟无关的原因分别用作对照组1和对照组2。 >结果:尽管使用不同对照组的癌症死亡人数随地区和年龄而异,但在分析中观察到结果的一致性。可以使用15%的标准确定大多数城市中死亡率高的癌症死亡的等效性,但是对于农村地区的大多数癌症,无论是否进行假设检验,都不确定 表现出或没有显着差异。>结论: 病例对照研究的替代对照选择是有效且可行的, 等效研究的基本原理也得到了支持 流行病学调查数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号