首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife >Surrogate hosts: Hunting dogs and recolonizing grey wolves share their endoparasites
【2h】

Surrogate hosts: Hunting dogs and recolonizing grey wolves share their endoparasites

机译:代孕宿主:猎狗和重新定殖的灰狼共享体内寄生虫

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Understanding how closely related wildlife species and their domesticated counterparts exchange or share parasites, or replace each other in parasite life cycles, is of great interest to veterinary and human public health, and wildlife ecology. Grey wolves (Canis lupus) host and spread endoparasites that can either directly infect canid conspecifics or their prey serving as intermediate hosts of indirectly transmitted species. The wolf recolonization of Central Europe represents an opportunity to study parasite transmission dynamics between wildlife and domestic species for cases when a definitive host returns after local extinction – a situation equivalent to a ‘removal experiment’.Here we investigate whether the re–appearance of wolves has increased parasite pressure on hunting dogs – a group of companion animals of particular interest as they have a similar diet to wolves and flush wolf habitats when hunting. We compared prevalence (P) and species richness (SR) of helminths and the protozoan Sarcocystis to determine whether they were higher in hunting dogs from wolf areas (ndogs = 49) than a control area (ndogs = 29) without wolves. Of particular interest were S. grueneri and S. taeniata, known as ‘wolf specialists’.Five helminth and 11 Sarcocystis species were identified, of which all helminths and eight Sarcocystis species were shared between dogs and wolves. Overall prevalence and species richness of helminths (P:38.5% vs. 24.1%; SRmean:0.4 vs. 0.3 species) and Sarcocystis (P:63.3% vs. 65.5%, SRmean:2.1 vs. 1.8 species) did not differ between study sites. However, hunting dogs were significantly more likely to be infected with S. grueneri in wolf areas (P:45.2% vs. 10.5%; p = 0.035). The findings suggest that wolves indirectly increase S. grueneri infection risk for hunting dogs since cervids are intermediate hosts and occasionally fed to dogs. Furthermore, a periodic anthelminthic treatment of hunting dogs may be an effective measure to control helminth infections regardless of wolf presence.
机译:兽医和人类公共卫生以及野生生物生态学对了解紧密相关的野生动植物物种及其驯化的同伴之间如何交换或共享寄生虫,或在寄生虫的生命周期中相互替代十分了解。灰狼(天狼犬)寄养并传播内寄生虫,它们可以直接感染犬科犬种或它们的猎物,作为间接传播物种的中间宿主。中欧的狼群定殖为研究确定的宿主在局部灭绝后返回的情况下研究野生动植物与家养物种之间的寄生虫传播动态提供了机会,这种情况相当于“清除实验”。在这里,我们调查了狼群是否重新出现会增加猎狗的寄生虫压力-一群特别感兴趣的伴侣动物,因为它们的饮食与狼相似,在狩猎时会冲动狼的栖息地。我们比较了蠕虫和原生动物肉囊虫的患病率(P)和物种丰富度(SR),以确定它们在来自狼区(ndogs = 49)的猎狗中是否高于没有狼的对照区(ndogs = 29)。特别令人感兴趣的是被称为“狼专家”的格氏链球菌和taeniata链球菌。共鉴定出5种蠕虫和11种肉孢子虫,其中所有蠕虫和8种肉孢子虫在狗和狼之间共享。蠕虫的总体患病率和物种丰富度(P:38.5%vs. 24.1%; SRmean:0.4 vs. 0.3种)和肉囊虫(P:63.3%vs. 65.5%,SRmean:2.1 vs. 1.8种)在研究之间没有差异网站。但是,猎狗在狼区感染沙门氏菌的可能性更高(P:45.2%对10.5%; p = 0.035)。研究结果表明,由于鹿是中间宿主,偶尔会喂食狗,因此狼间接增加了猎狗对格鲁尼酵母的感染风险。此外,无论是否有狼,定期对犬进行驱虫治疗可能是控制蠕虫感染的有效措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号