首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Reproductive Biomedicine >A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter abdominal circumference mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight
【2h】

A new formula for estimating fetal weight: The impression of biparietal diameter abdominal circumference mid-thigh soft tissue thickness and femoral length on birth weight

机译:估计胎儿体重的新公式:双顶径腹围大腿中部软组织厚度和股骨长度对出生体重的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Abdominal circumference (AC), biparietal diameters (BPD) and femoral length (FL) are now the main parameters used to obtain estimated fetal weight (EFW). Although the role of soft tissue parameters in determining fetal weight was proved but clinical attention to mid-thigh soft tissue thickness (STT) is limited. >Objective: To find the impression of STT on birth weight (BW) and represent a new predictive formula. >Materials and Methods: One hundred and fourteen normal singleton term (36-42w) pregnancies with delivery within 72 hours were randomly selected to participate in this prospective cohort study. Variables measured by ultrasonography before birth included: AC, BPD, FL and STT. The actual neonatal BW was also measured after birth. Linear regression model was used and R square and p-value were reported. >Results: The mean (SD) of BW was 3406 (405) gr. R square was best fit for the model that STT was added to AC, BPD, FL (r2: 0.77). R square for the model using BPD, AC, FL and model using BPD, STT, FL was the same (r2: 0.7). Best fit formula was Log (BW)= 2.461+0.003BPD+0.001AC+0.007STT+0.005FL. AC (R: 0.67, p<0.001), STT (R: 0.50, p<0.001), BPD (R: 0.59, p<0.001), FL (R: 0.66, p<0.001) were significantly correlated with birth weight. AC had also significant correlation with STT (p=0.001) >Conclusion: This study showed adding STT to other variables in predictive models of fetal weight would provide a nice estimation (r2=0.77) and in cases that measuring AC is suboptimal STT may be a good replacement.
机译:>背景:腹围(AC),双顶径(BPD)和股骨长度(FL)现在是用于获取估计胎儿体重(EFW)的主要参数。尽管已经证明了软组织参数在确定胎儿体重中的作用,但对大腿中部软组织厚度(STT)的临床关注受到限制。 >目标::查找STT对出生体重(BW)的印象并代表一个新的预测公式。 >材料和方法:随机选择在72小时内分娩的114例正常单胎妊娠(36-42w)孕妇参加这项前瞻性队列研究。出生前通过超声检查测量的变量包括:AC,BPD,FL和STT。出生后还测量了实际的新生儿体重。使用线性回归模型,并报告了R平方和p值。 >结果: BW的平均值(SD)为3406(405)gr。 R平方最适合将STT添加到AC,BPD,FL的模型(r 2 :0.77)。使用BPD,AC,FL的模型和使用BPD,STT,FL的模型的R平方相同(r 2 :0.7)。最佳拟合公式为Log(BW)= 2.461 + 0.003BPD + 0.001AC + 0.007STT + 0.005FL。 AC(R:0.67,p <0.001),STT(R:0.50,p <0.001),BPD(R:0.59,p <0.001),FL(R:0.66,p <0.001)与出生体重显着相关。 AC与STT也有显着相关性(p = 0.001)>结论:该研究表明,在胎儿体重的预测模型中将STT添加到其他变量中可以提供很好的估计(r 2 = 0.77),并且在测量交流电时,STT不够理想。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号