首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Surgery >Comparison Between Transverse Mini-Incision and Longitudinal Mini-Incision for the Resection of Locally Advanced Colonic Cancer
【2h】

Comparison Between Transverse Mini-Incision and Longitudinal Mini-Incision for the Resection of Locally Advanced Colonic Cancer

机译:横向小切口和纵向小切口切除局部晚期结肠癌的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We performed a retrospective review of non-overweight (body mass index ≤ 25 kg/m2) patients scheduled to undergo a curative resection of locally advanced colon cancer via a transverse mini-incision (n = 62) or a longitudinal mini-incision (skin incision ≤7 cm, n = 62), with the latter group of patients randomly selected as historical controls matched with the former group according to tumor location. Extension of the transverse mini-incision wound was necessary in 3 patients (5%). Both groups were largely equivalent in terms of demographic, clinicopathological, and surgical factors and frequency of postoperative complications. Postoperative analgesic was significantly less (P = 0.04) and postoperative length of the hospital stay was significantly shorter (P < 0.01) in the transverse mini-incision group. Concerning a mini-incision approach for locally advanced colonic cancer, a transverse incision seems to be advantageous with regard to minimal invasiveness and early recovery compared with a longitudinal incision.
机译:我们对非超重(体重指数≤25 kg / m 2 )计划通过横向小切口行根治性切除局部晚期结肠癌的患者进行回顾性回顾(n = 62)或纵向小切口(皮肤切口≤7cm,n = 62),后一组患者根据肿瘤位置随机选择作为历史对照,与前一组匹配。 3例(5%)患者需要扩大横切面切口。两组在人口统计学,临床病理和手术因素以及术后并发症发生频率上基本相同。横向小切口治疗组的术后镇痛效果显着降低(P = 0.04),术后住院时间明显缩短(P <0.01)。关于局部晚期结肠癌的微切口方法,与纵向切口相比,横向切口在最小侵入性和早期恢复方面似乎是有利的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号