首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Scholarly Research Notices >Diagnostic Accuracy of Mucosal Biopsy versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Barretts Esophagus and Related Superficial Lesions
【2h】

Diagnostic Accuracy of Mucosal Biopsy versus Endoscopic Mucosal Resection in Barretts Esophagus and Related Superficial Lesions

机译:巴雷特食管及相关浅表病变的黏膜活检与内镜黏膜切除术的诊断准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background. Endoscopic surveillance for early detection of dysplastic or neoplastic changes in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) depends usually on biopsy. The diagnostic and therapeutic role of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in BE is rapidly growing. Objective. The aim of this study was to check the accuracy of biopsy for precise histopathologic diagnosis of dysplasia and neoplasia, compared to EMR in patients having BE and related superficial esophageal lesions. Methods. A total of 48 patients with previously diagnosed BE (36 men, 12 women, mean age 49.75 ± 13.3 years) underwent routine surveillance endoscopic examination. Biopsies were taken from superficial lesions, if present, and otherwise from BE segments. Then, EMR was performed within three weeks. Results. Biopsy based histopathologic diagnoses were nondysplastic BE (NDBE), 22 cases; low-grade dysplasia (LGD), 14 cases; high-grade dysplasia (HGD), 8 cases; intramucosal carcinoma (IMC), two cases; and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC), two cases. EMR based diagnosis differed from biopsy based diagnosis (either upgrading or downgrading) in 20 cases (41.67%), (Kappa = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.170–0.69). Conclusions. Biopsy is not a satisfactory method for accurate diagnosis of dysplastic or neoplastic changes in BE patients with or without suspicious superficial lesions. EMR should therefore be the preferred diagnostic method in such patients.
机译:背景。内镜监测以早期发现Barrett食管(BE)患者的增生或赘生性改变通常取决于活检。内镜下黏膜切除术(EMR)在BE中的诊断和治疗作用正在迅速增长。目的。这项研究的目的是检查与BE和相关浅表食管病变患者的EMR相比,活检的准确性,以组织病理学诊断不典型增生和赘生物。方法。共有48例先前被诊断为BE的患者(男36例,女12例,平均年龄49.75±13.3岁)接受了常规内镜检查。活检取自浅表病变(如果存在),否则取自BE段。然后,在三周内进行了EMR。结果。基于活检的组织病理学诊断为非增生性BE(NDBE)22例。低度不典型增生(LGD)14例;高度不典型增生(HGD)8例;粘膜内癌(IMC)2例;和浸润性腺癌(IAC)两例。基于EMR的诊断与基于活检的诊断(升级或降级)不同(20例,占41.67%)(Kappa = 0.43,95%CI:0.170-0.69)。结论。对于有或没有可疑表浅病变的BE患者,活检不是准确诊断增生或赘生性改变的令人满意的方法。因此,EMR应该是此类患者的首选诊断方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号