首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Interventional Cardiology Review >Review of Data and Discussion – Who Should Undergo Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 2014?
【2h】

Review of Data and Discussion – Who Should Undergo Patent Foramen Ovale Closure in 2014?

机译:数据审查与讨论– 2014年谁应该进行封孔卵圆形封闭?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A patent foramen ovale is a relatively common finding in the general population and is associated with a number of conditions, including cryptogenic stroke. In 2014, percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is a frequently performed procedure; the bulk of these procedures being carried out for secondary prevention of cryptogenic stroke, along with other indications, such as prevention of decompression illness, platypnoea-orthodeoxia syndrome and migraine. Of these conditions the largest body of evidence available is for cryptogenic stroke and there is ongoing debate of the benefit of PFO closure over medical therapy. This article will review the available evidence of PFO closure in each of these contexts, with a particular focus on randomised controlled trials, and endeavour to outline in whom the evidence suggests closure should be considered.
机译:卵圆孔未闭是在普通人群中相对普遍的发现,并与多种疾病相关,包括隐源性中风。在2014年,经皮卵圆形闭孔(PFO)封堵是一种经常执行的手术;这些程序中的大部分用于继发性预防隐源性中风以及其他适应症,例如预防减压病,鸭嘴兽正畸综合症和偏头痛。在这些情况中,可获得的最大证据是隐源性中风,关于PFO封闭优于药物治疗的益处仍存在争议。本文将回顾在每种情况下PFO封闭的可用证据,特别关注随机对照试验,并努力概述在哪些证据中应该考虑封闭。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号