首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Endodontic Journal >Sample Size Calculation of Clinical Trials Published in Two Leading Endodontic Journals
【2h】

Sample Size Calculation of Clinical Trials Published in Two Leading Endodontic Journals

机译:两种领先的牙髓期刊发表的临床试验的样本量计算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: The purpose of this article was to evaluate the quality of sample size calculation reports in published clinical trials in Journal of Endodontics and International Endodontic Journal in years 2000-1 and 2009-10. >Materials and Methods: Articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria were collected. The criteria were: publication year, research design, types of control group, reporting sample size calculation, the number of participants in each group, study outcome, amount of type I (α) and II (β) errors, method used for estimating prevalence or standard deviation, percentage of meeting the expected sample size and considering clinically importance level in sample size calculation. Data were extracted from all included articles. Descriptive analyses were conducted. Inferential statistical analyses were done using independent T-test and Chi-square test with the significance level set at 0.05. >Results: There was a statistically significant increase in years between 2009 and 10 compared to 2000-1 in terms of reporting sample size calculation (P=0.002), reporting clinically importance level (P=0.003) and in samples size of clinical trials (P=0.01). But there was not any significant difference between two journals in terms of reporting sample size calculation, type of control group, frequency of various study designs and frequency of positive and negative clinical trials in different time periods (P>0.05). >Conclusion: Sample size calculation in endodontic clinical trials improved significantly in 2009-10 when compared to 2000-1; however further improvements would be desirable.
机译:>简介:本文旨在评估2000-1和2009-10年间《牙髓学杂志》和《国际牙髓学杂志》上已发表的临床试验中样本量计算报告的质量。 >材料和方法:收集符合纳入标准的文章。评估标准为:发表年份,研究设计,对照组类型,报告样本量计算,每组参与者人数,研究结果,I型(α)和II型(β)错误数量,估计患病率的方法或标准差,即达到预期样本量并在样本量计算中考虑临床重要性水平的百分比。从所有纳入的文章中提取数据。进行描述性分析。使用独立的T检验和卡方检验进行推断统计分析,显着性水平设置为0.05。 >结果:从报告样本量计算(P = 0.002),报告临床重要性水平(P = 0.003)和报告样本量计算(2009年至10年)的2000年与2000-1年相比,统计上的显着增加。临床试验的样本量(P = 0.01)。但是,在报告样本量计算,对照组类型,各种研究设计的频率以及不同时期的阳性和阴性临床试验的频率方面,两种期刊之间没有显着差异(P> 0.05)。 >结论:与2000-1年相比,2009-10年牙髓临床试验的样本量计算有了显着改善;然而,将需要进一步的改进。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号