首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Iranian Journal of Psychiatry >Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) DERS-6 DERS-5- Revised (in an Iranian Clinical Sample
【2h】

Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale) DERS-6 DERS-5- Revised (in an Iranian Clinical Sample

机译:波斯语版本的情绪调节量表的困难心理计量学特性DERS-6和DERS-5-修订(在伊朗临床样本中)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the construct validity and reliability of the two forms of the Persian version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-6 & DERS-5-revised) in a clinical sample. >Methods: The clinical sample consisted of 181 patients diagnosed with Functional GI Disorders (FGID) who referred to the digestive psychosomatic clinic in Isfahan in 2012. They were selected by census method (In a given period of time). The Persian version of the DERS, the short form of the DASS, and the TAS-20 were used to collect data. >Results: The results of the factor structure or construct validity using principal components analysis with varimax rotation recognized 7 factors for the DERS-6 (Goals, Awarness, Impalse, Non Acceptance, Strategy, Clarity, Recognition), and 6 factors for the DERS-5- revised (Non Acceptance, Goals, Impalse, Strategy, Clarity, Recognition) in the clinical sample. They showed the common variance of 59.51% and 59.15%, respectively. Also, the results showed that the concurrent validity of both forms of the DERS and most of their factors, and their reliability in terms of Cronbach-Alpha were favorable. >Discussion: Considering the factor structure and favorable psychometric properties of the two scales of DERS-6 & DERS-5-revised, the scales can be used in clinical samples.
机译:>目的:本研究的目的是在情绪调节量表(DERS-6和DERS-5修订版)中确定两种形式的波斯版难度困难的构造效度和可靠性。临床样品。 >方法:该临床样本由181位诊断为功能性胃肠疾病(FGID)的患者组成,他们于2012年在伊斯法罕市的消化心身诊所就诊。通过普查方法(在指定时期内)进行选择。 。 DERS的波斯版本,DASS的缩写形式和TAS-20用于收集数据。 >结果:使用具有最大方差旋转的主成分分析进行的因子结构或构建效度的结果,识别出DERS-6的7个因子(目标,警觉性,冲动,不接受,策略,清晰度,识别性),在临床样本中对DERS-5-修订的6个因素(不接受,目标,冲动,策略,清晰度,认可度)。他们的共同方差分别为59.51%和59.15%。此外,结果表明,两种形式的DERS及其大多数因素的并发有效性和Cronbach-Alpha方面的可靠性都是有利的。 >讨论:考虑到修订后的DERS-6和DERS-5两种量表的因素结构和良好的心理计量学特性,这些量表可用于临床样本。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号