首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>JARO: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology >Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss
【2h】

Cues for Diotic and Dichotic Detection of a 500-Hz Tone in Noise Vary with Hearing Loss

机译:带有听力损失的噪声变化中的500 Hz音的二阶和二阶检测提示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hearing in noise is a challenge for all listeners, especially for those with hearing loss. This study compares cues used for detection of a low-frequency tone in noise by older listeners with and without hearing loss to those of younger listeners with normal hearing. Performance varies significantly across different reproducible, or “frozen,” masker waveforms. Analysis of these waveforms allows identification of the cues that are used for detection. This study included diotic (N0S0) and dichotic (N0Sπ) detection of a 500-Hz tone, with either narrowband or wideband masker waveforms. Both diotic and dichotic detection patterns (hit and false alarm rates) across the ensembles of noise maskers were predicted by envelope-slope cues, and diotic results were also predicted by energy cues. The relative importance of energy and envelope cues for diotic detection was explored with a roving-level paradigm that made energy cues unreliable. Most older listeners with normal hearing or mild hearing loss depended on envelope-related temporal cues, even for this low-frequency target. As hearing threshold at 500 Hz increased, the cues for diotic detection transitioned from envelope to energy cues. Diotic detection patterns for young listeners with normal hearing are best predicted by a model that combines temporal- and energy-related cues; in contrast, combining cues did not improve predictions for older listeners with or without hearing loss. Dichotic detection results for all groups of listeners were best predicted by interaural envelope cues, which significantly outperformed the classic cues based on interaural time and level differences or their optimal combination.
机译:噪音对所有听众来说都是一个挑战,尤其是对于那些有听力损失的听众而言。这项研究比较了有听力障碍和无听力障碍的老年听众与正常听力的年轻听众用于检测噪音中低频音的提示。在不同的可复制或“冻结”掩蔽波形中,性能差异很大。这些波形的分析可以识别用于检测的线索。这项研究包括对500 Hz音调进行双音(N0S0)和双音(N0Sπ)检测,具有窄带或宽带掩蔽波形。包络斜率线索预测了整个噪声掩蔽者集合的偶发和偶发检测模式(命中率和误报率),能量线索也预测了噪声结果。能量和包络线索对于二值检测的相对重要性已通过粗略级范式探讨,该范式使能量线索不可靠。大多数听力正常或轻度听力下降的老龄听众都依赖于与包络有关的时间暗示,即使对于这个低频目标也是如此。随着500 Hz的听觉阈值的增加,用于Diotic检测的提示从包络提示转变为能量提示。结合时间和能量相关提示的模型可以最好地预测听力正常的年轻听众的双音检测模式。相比之下,合并提示并不能改善有或没有听力损失的老年听众的预测。通过听觉包络提示可以最好地预测所有听众的双歧检测结果,基于听觉时间和水平差异或它们的最佳组合,这大大优于经典提示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号