首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Bacteriology >Inferring Genome Trees by Using a Filter To Eliminate Phylogenetically Discordant Sequences and a Distance Matrix Based on Mean Normalized BLASTP Scores
【2h】

Inferring Genome Trees by Using a Filter To Eliminate Phylogenetically Discordant Sequences and a Distance Matrix Based on Mean Normalized BLASTP Scores

机译:基于平均归一化BLASTP分数的过滤器消除系统发生不一致性序列和距离矩阵的基因组树推断

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Darwin's paradigm holds that the diversity of present-day organisms has arisen via a process of genetic descent with modification, as on a bifurcating tree. Evidence is accumulating that genes are sometimes transferred not along lineages but rather across lineages. To the extent that this is so, Darwin's paradigm can apply only imperfectly to genomes, potentially complicating or perhaps undermining attempts to reconstruct historical relationships among genomes (i.e., a genome tree). Whether most genes in a genome have arisen via treelike (vertical) descent or by lateral transfer across lineages can be tested if enough complete genome sequences are used. We define a phylogenetically discordant sequence (PDS) as an open reading frame (ORF) that exhibits patterns of similarity relationships statistically distinguishable from those of most other ORFs in the same genome. PDSs represent between 6.0 and 16.8% (mean, 10.8%) of the analyzable ORFs in the genomes of 28 bacteria, eight archaea, and one eukaryote (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). In this study we developed and assessed a distance-based approach, based on mean pairwise sequence similarity, for generating genome trees. Exclusion of PDSs improved bootstrap support for basal nodes but altered few topological features, indicating that there is little systematic bias among PDSs. Many but not all features of the genome tree from which PDSs were excluded are consistent with the 16S rRNA tree.
机译:达尔文的范式认为,当今生物的多样性是通过经过遗传修饰的遗传后代过程产生的,就像在分支树上一样。越来越多的证据表明,基因有时不沿谱系而是沿谱系转移。在这种情况下,达尔文范式仅能不完美地应用于基因组,从而可能使重建基因组之间历史关系的尝试变得复杂或破坏。如果使用了足够的完整基因组序列,可以测试基因组中的大多数基因是通过树状(垂直)下降还是通过沿谱系的横向转移而产生的。我们将系统发育不一致性序列(PDS)定义为一个开放阅读框(ORF),该序列显示出与统计学上与同一基因组中大多数其他ORF相似的相似性关系模式。在28种细菌,8种古细菌和一种真核生物(酿酒酵母)的基因组中,PDS占可分析ORF的6.0%至16.8%(平均10.8%)。在这项研究中,我们开发并评估了一种基于距离的方法,该方法基于平均成对序列相似性来生成基因组树。排除PDS可以改善对基节点的引导支持,但很少更改拓扑特征,这表明PDS之间几乎没有系统性偏差。从中排除了PDS的基因组树的许多但不是全部特征与16S rRNA树一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号