首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Biomolecular Techniques : JBT >In-Depth Analysis of Human and Mouse Plasma Using 3-D and 4-D Fractionation Strategies
【2h】

In-Depth Analysis of Human and Mouse Plasma Using 3-D and 4-D Fractionation Strategies

机译:使用3-D和4-D分馏策略对人和小鼠血浆进行深度分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In-depth profiling of plasma proteomes can potentially identify novel disease biomarkers. But few biomarkers identified by proteomic approaches have advanced to early-stage clinical testing because they often are not sufficiently disease specific. Major challenges in plasma proteome analysis include the very wide dynamic range of protein concentrations, the high protein complexity, and the substantial heterogeneity of most protein concentrations in the normal human population. Because most disease-specific biomarkers are present in blood at very low concentrations, extensive fractionation is required prior to LC-MS/MS analysis. In general, more fractionation will result in greater depth of analysis, but there is a point of diminishing return for each fractionation method and throughput decreases as the number of LC-MS/MS runs per proteome increases. A common feature of most current plasma profiling methods is to first immunodeplete as many high abundance plasma proteins as possible, followed by extensive protein fractionation of the depleted plasma prior to trypsin digestion and LC-MS/MS. In addition, reliable quantitative comparisons are needed for most types of studies. While all quantitative methods have strengths and weaknesses, label-free quantitative comparison of LC-MS signals is increasing in popularity and seems adequately reproducible for most studies. Our laboratory commonly uses two alternative plasma proteome analysis strategies. One powerful approach utilizes a 3-D protein/peptide profiling method consisting of depleting 20 abundant proteins followed by 1-D SDS PAGE, fractionation of the gel lane into 20 to 60 fractions and LC-MS/MS analysis. Proteins can be quantitatively compared using label-free analysis of ion current patterns from the MS full scans. An even greater depth of analysis can be achieved using a 4-D protein/peptide profiling strategy utilizing microscale solution isoelectrofocusing of proteins prior the SDS gel in the 3-D scheme, although throughput is substantially reduced.
机译:血浆蛋白质组的深入分析可以潜在地鉴定新型疾病生物标志物。但是,通过蛋白质组学方法鉴定的生物标志物很少能进入早期临床试验,因为它们通常对疾病没有足够的特异性。血浆蛋白质组学分析的主要挑战包括蛋白质浓度的动态范围非常宽,蛋白质复杂性高以及正常人群中大多数蛋白质浓度的显着异质性。由于大多数疾病特异性生物标志物都以非常低的浓度存在于血液中,因此在进行LC-MS / MS分析之前需要进行大量分离。通常,更多的分离将导致更大的分析深度,但是每种分离方法都有一个递减的点,并且随着每个蛋白质组的LC-MS / MS运行次数的增加,通量也会降低。当前大多数血浆谱分析方法的一个共同特点是,首先免疫去除尽可能多的高丰度血浆蛋白,然后在胰蛋白酶消化和LC-MS / MS之前对耗尽的血浆进行广泛的蛋白分级分离。此外,大多数类型的研究都需要可靠的定量比较。尽管所有定量方法都有其优点和缺点,但LC-MS信号的无标记定量比较正在日益普及,并且对于大多数研究而言似乎可以充分再现。我们的实验室通常使用两种替代血浆蛋白质组分析策略。一种有效的方法是利用3-D蛋白质/肽谱分析方法,该方法包括消耗20种丰富的蛋白质,然后进行1-D SDS PAGE,将凝胶泳道分级成20至60个级分以及LC-MS / MS分析。可以使用无标记的MS全扫描离子流模式分析来定量比较蛋白质。使用4-D蛋白质/肽谱分析策略可实现更大的分析深度,尽管在3D方案中SDS凝胶之前使用了蛋白质的微尺度溶液等电聚焦,但吞吐量却大大降低。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号