首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Vaccines >Can Communication Strategies Combat COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy with Trade-Off between Public Service Messages and Public Skepticism? Experimental Evidence from Pakistan
【2h】

Can Communication Strategies Combat COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy with Trade-Off between Public Service Messages and Public Skepticism? Experimental Evidence from Pakistan

机译:通信策略可以打击Covid-19疫苗犹豫不决在公共服务消息和公共怀疑论之间进行权衡吗?来自巴基斯坦的实验证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The COVID-19 pandemic may have reached a turning point as the World Health Organization and the global community of nations step up plans for mass vaccination campaigns. However, the COVID-19 vaccine-related conspiracy theories (e.g., falsehoods about birth control, women infertility, surveillance, and microchip humanity, etc.) have built new momentum for vaccine hesitancy. To this end, several nations worldwide, including Pakistan, are struggling to boost public trust and enthusiasm to get vaccinated, especially in an anxious and complicated atmosphere propelled by multiple, new and the deadliest variants of COVID-19. To address this critical research gap during these intensifying conditions of vaccine hesitancy, the present study makes the first attempt to explore the potential effects of various communication strategies, including public service message (safety benefits versus fear appraisals), media types (i.e., traditional versus digital), self-efficacy, perceived benefits and threats (susceptibility and severity), on the willingness to get vaccinated for COVID-19. Importantly, the underlying effects of public skepticism (in a moderating role) on these relationships were empirically examined. Using four fictitious COVID-19 immunization campaigns in a series of experiments with 2 (media type: traditional vs. digital) X 2 (service attribute: health and safety benefits vs. fear) message frames (represented as Group one to Group four), the findings identified fear appraisal as the most viable communication strategy in combating vaccine hesitancy. Moreover, public skepticism negatively moderated the effects of media types and public service message attributes on willingness to get vaccinated in relatively high (i.e., Group two), moderate (i.e., Group one and four), and low intensities (i.e., Group three). The pioneering findings of this research offer new strategic insights for the global health authorities and vaccine promoters to proactively address the downward spiral of people’s willingness to take the COVID-19 vaccine.
机译:Covid-19 Pandemery可能已经达到了世界卫生组织的转折点,全球各国社区加强了大规模疫苗接种活动的计划。然而,Covid-19与疫苗相关的阴谋理论(例如,关于出生控制的虚假,女性不孕,监测和微芯片人类等)已经为疫苗犹豫不决地建立了新的动力。为此,全球范围内的几个国家(包括巴基斯坦)正在努力提高公众信任和热情,占据疫苗接种,特别是在由多重,新的和最致命的Covid-19致命的变种推动的焦虑和复杂的气氛中。为了解决这一关键的研究缺口,在这些强化疫苗犹豫不决的条件下,本研究使第一次尝试探索各种通信策略的潜在影响,包括公共服务消息(安全福利与恐惧评估),媒体类型(即传统类型数字),自我效能,感知益处和威胁(易感性和严重程度),愿意为Covid-19接种接种疫苗。重要的是,经验证明,公共怀疑症的潜在影响(在调节作用中)的潜在影响被审查了这些关系。在一系列实验中使用四个虚拟的Covid-19免疫活动,其中包括2(媒体类型:传统的VS. Digital)x 2(服务属性:健康和安全福利与恐惧)留言帧(表示为第四组组),该研究结果确定了恐惧评估,作为打击疫苗犹豫不决的最可行的沟通策略。此外,公共怀疑主义对媒体类型和公共服务消息属性的影响对在相对较高(即,第2组),中等(即,第一个和四个)和低强度(即,第三组)中的愿望方面对培养基疫苗的影响进行了促进。这项研究的开拓调查结果为全球卫生当局和疫苗推动者提供了新的战略解见景,以主动解决人们愿意拿走Covid-19疫苗的愿望。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号