首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Open Respiratory Medicine Journal >Current Utility of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score: A Literature Review and Future Directions
【2h】

Current Utility of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score: A Literature Review and Future Directions

机译:顺序器官失败评估得分的当前效用:文献综述和未来方向

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is commonly used in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) to evaluate, prognosticate and assess patients. Since its validation, the SOFA score has served in various settings, including medical, trauma, surgical, cardiac, and neurological ICUs. It has been a strong mortality predictor and literature over the years has documented the ability of the SOFA score to accurately distinguish survivors from non-survivors on admission. Over the years, multiple variations have been proposed to the SOFA score, which have led to the evolution of alternate validated scoring models replacing one or more components of the SOFA scoring system. Various SOFA based models have been used to evaluate specific clinical populations, such as patients with cardiac dysfunction, hepatic failure, renal failure, different races and public health illnesses, etc. This study is aimed to conduct a review of modifications in SOFA score in the past several years. We review the literature evaluating various modifications to the SOFA score such as modified SOFA, Modified SOFA, modified Cardiovascular SOFA, Extra-renal SOFA, Chronic Liver Failure SOFA, Mexican SOFA, quick SOFA, Lactic acid quick SOFA (LqSOFA), SOFA in hematological malignancies, SOFA with Richmond Agitation-Sedation scale and Pediatric SOFA. Various organ systems, their relevant scoring and the proposed modifications in each of these systems are presented in detail. There is a need to incorporate the most recent literature into the SOFA scoring system to make it more relevant and accurate in this rapidly evolving critical care environment. For future directions, we plan to put together most if not all updates in SOFA score and probably validate it in a large database a single institution and validate it in multisite data base.
机译:顺序器官失败评估(沙发)分数通常用于重症监护单元(ICU),以评估,预后和评估患者。自验证以来,沙发得分在各种环境中提供,包括医疗,创伤,外科,心脏和神经疾病icu。多年来一直是强烈的死亡率预测和文学,已经记录了沙发评分的能力,以便将幸存者从非幸存者入院中进行准确地区分幸存者。多年来,已经提出了对沙发评分的多种变化,这导致了替代的替代验证评分模型的演变,取代了沙发评分系统的一个或多个组件。基于SOFA的模型已被用于评估特定的临床群体,例如心脏功能障碍,肝功能衰竭,肾衰竭,不同种族和公共卫生疾病等患者。该研究旨在对沙发得分进行审查过去几年。我们审查了对沙发评分的各种修改的文献,如改良沙发,改良沙发,改良的心血管沙发,肾沙发,慢性肝功能衰竭沙发,墨西哥沙发,快速沙发,乳酸快速沙发(LQSOFA),沙发血液学恶性肿瘤,沙发有里士满激动镇静规模和儿科沙发。详细介绍了各种器官系统,它们相关评分和每个系统中的所提出的修改。需要将最近的文献纳入沙发评分系统中,使其在这种快速发展的关键护理环境中更加相关和准确。对于未来的方向,我们计划将大多数组合在一起,如果不是SOFA分数中的所有更新,并且可能在一个大型数据库中验证单个机构并在多站点数据库中验证它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号