首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health >How Do Networks Reflect Collaborative Governance? The Case of a Sport Policy Program
【2h】

How Do Networks Reflect Collaborative Governance? The Case of a Sport Policy Program

机译:网络如何反映协作治理?体育政策计划的案例

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examines the extent to which collaborative governance thinking is realized in a government-funded sport policy program. Our main argument is that this conversion requires the analysis and interpretation of meso-governance and related networks. In the analysis of meso-level sports policy governance networks, we apply social network analysis and theme interviews. The empirical analysis conducted in this study involves the network-based structure of the Finnish Schools on the Move (FSM) program, which was implemented in Finland from 2009 to 2018. Our research questions are as follows: (1) How have the nature and network structure of the program changed throughout the implementation of the program? (2) How is the collaborative governance thinking reflected in the design and implementation of the FSM program? This study shows that the network is the most significant intermediary structure at the policy and organizational levels. Particularly, it was important in the start-up phase of the program, when the main task of the network was to bring together different actors and to generate a common vision. By the end of the program’s funding, the structure of the network became centralized, with decreasing density. However, the analysis shows that collaborative governance thinking is mainly reflected in implementation, rather than in the genuine joint planning of activities.
机译:本研究探讨了政府资助的运动政策计划中实现了合作治理思维的程度。我们的主要论点是,这种转换需要分析和解释中俄治理和相关网络。在分析中学水平体育政策治理网络中,我们应用社交网络分析和主题访谈。本研究中进行的实证分析涉及芬兰学校的基于网络的结构(FSM)计划,该计划于2009年至2018年在芬兰实施。我们的研究问题如下:(1)性质如何和程序的网络结构在整个程序的实施过程中更改了? (2)如何在FSM计划的设计和实施中反映的协作治理思维如何?本研究表明,该网络是政策和组织层面最重要的中介结构。特别是,当网络的主要任务是将不同的演员组合在一起并产生共同视觉时,这在程序的启动阶段很重要。在该计划的资金结束时,网络的结构集中,密度降低。然而,分析表明,协作治理思维主要反映在实施中,而不是在真正的共同规划方面。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号