首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Effects of habitat types on the dynamic changes in allocation in carbon and nitrogen storage of vegetation–soil system in sandy grasslands: How habitat types affect C and N allocation?
【2h】

Effects of habitat types on the dynamic changes in allocation in carbon and nitrogen storage of vegetation–soil system in sandy grasslands: How habitat types affect C and N allocation?

机译:栖息地类型对桑迪草地植被土体系碳和氮素贮藏碳氮贮藏动态变化的影响:栖息地类型如何影响C和N分配?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The progressively restoration of degraded vegetation in semiarid and arid desertified areas undoubtedly formed different habitat types. The most plants regulate their growth by fixing carbon with their energy deriving from photosynthesis; carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) play the crucial role in regulating plant growth, community structure, and function in the vegetation restoration progress. However, it is still unclear how habitat types affect the dynamic changes in allocation in C and N storage of vegetation–soil system in sandy grasslands. Here, we investigated plant community characteristics and soil properties across three successional stages of habitat types: semi‐fixed dunes (SFD), fixed dunes (FD), and grasslands (G) in 2011, 2013, and 2015. We also examined the C and N concentrations of vegetation–soil system and estimated their C and N storage. The C and N storage of vegetation system, soil, and vegetation–soil system remarkably increased from SFD to G. The litter C and N storage in SFD, N storage of vegetation system in SFD, and N storage of soil and vegetation–soil system in FD increased from 2011 to 2015, while aboveground plant C and N storage of FD were higher in 2011 than in 2013 and 2015. Most of C and N were sequestered in soil in the vegetation restoration progress. These results suggest that the dynamic changes in allocation in C and N storage in vegetation–soil systems varied with habitat types. Our study highlights that SFD has higher N sequestration rate in vegetation, while FD has the considerably N sequestration rate in the soil.
机译:退化植被的在半干旱和干旱沙区逐渐恢复无疑形成的不同的生境类型。最植物通过固定与他们的能量来自光合作用获得碳调节其生长;碳(C)和氮(N)在调节植物生长,群落结构,和功能在植被恢复进展中的关键作用。但是,目前还不清楚的生境类型如何影响碳,氮贮量植被土壤系统的沙质草原分配的动态变化。在2011年,2013半固定沙丘(SFD),固定沙丘(FD),和草原(G),到2015年,我们还研究了C:在这里,我们调查了植物群落特征和整个栖息地类型三个演替阶段土壤理化性质植被土系统的和N浓度和估计它们的C和N的存储。植被系统,土壤和植被土系统的C和N从存储SFD显着增加至G的垫料的C和N中存储SFD,在SFD N个存储植被系统,和N个存储土壤和植被土系统的在FD从2011年增加至2015,而FD的地上植物C和N中存储2011均高于在2013年和2015年的大多数C和N在土壤中的植被恢复进展被螯合。这些结果表明,动态分配在与生境类型变化植被土系统改变C和N个存储。我们的研究着重指出,SFD在植被高N汇率,而FD在土壤中的相当ñ封存率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号