首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Diagnostics >Randomized Trial to Improve Primary Care Patient Management and Patient Outcomes Using a Drug–Drug Interaction Test: Confirmation of the DECART Simulated Patient Clinical Utility Trial Results
【2h】

Randomized Trial to Improve Primary Care Patient Management and Patient Outcomes Using a Drug–Drug Interaction Test: Confirmation of the DECART Simulated Patient Clinical Utility Trial Results

机译:随机试验通过药物 - 药物相互作用试验改善初级保健患者管理和患者结果:确认漂晶患者临床公用事业试验结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Drug–drug interactions (DDIs) are a serious problem in the healthcare system, leading to excess healthcare utilization and costs. We conducted a second prospective randomized, controlled trial to further establish the real-world clinical utility of a novel assay that objectively identifies potentially serious DDIs in real-world patients. Re-recruiting primary care physicians (PCPs) from our first randomized, controlled, simulated-patients study on DDIs, we experimentally introduced a definitive, urine-based mass spectrometry test intervention that the physicians could use when caring for their eligible patients. Patients were eligible if taking four or more prescription medications or suspected of taking other non-prescribed substances with potential medication interactions. The primary outcome was whether DDI testing changed clinical care. We explored a secondary outcome to see if the change in practice improved symptoms in patients with potential DDIs. A total of 169 control and 162 intervention patients were enrolled in the study, and their medical records were abstracted. In real-world patients, intervention physicians identified and/or treated a DDI at 3.0x the rate in their patient population compared to controls (21.6% vs. 7.1%, p < 0.001). Intervention physicians were more likely to discontinue or adjust the interacting agent compared to controls (62.9% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.001), and patient-reported symptoms also significantly declined (29.6% vs. 20.1%, p = 0.045). These results were nearly identical to concurrent measurements that used simulated patients, wherein intervention was more likely to both make a DDI diagnosis (56.3% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.001) and stop the interacting medications (58.3% versus 26.6%, p < 0.001). Bringing a new diagnostic test to market, particularly for an under-recognized clinical problem, requires robust data on both clinical validity and clinical utility. The results of this follow-up study showed that the use of DDI testing in real-world patients significantly improved (1) primary care patient management of drug interactions and (2) patient outcomes.
机译:药物 - 药物相互作用(DDIS)是医疗保健系统中的严重问题,导致过度的医疗保健利用率和成本。我们进行了第二次预期的随机对照试验,以进一步建立一个新的测定的现实世界临床效用,这些临床效用客观地识别现实世界患者中可能严重的DDIS。从我们的第一次随机,受控,模拟患者研究中重新招募初级保健医生(PCP),我们通过实验引入了基于尿基的基于尿的质谱测试干预,即医师可以在照顾合格患者时使用。如果服用四种或更多处方药或疑似潜在药物相互作用的其他非规定物质,患者有资格。主要结果是DDI测试是否改变了临床护理。我们探讨了次要结果,看看实践的变化是否改善了潜在DDIS患者的症状。在研究中共有169名控制和162名干预患者,并提出了他们的病历。在现实世界患者中,与对照相比,在其患者人群中鉴定和/或治疗DDI的干预医生(21.6%,P <0.001)。与对照组相比,干预医生更容易停止或调整相互作用剂(62.9%,P = 0.001),患者报告的症状也显着下降(29.6%,vs.0.1%,P = 0.045)。这些结果几乎与使用模拟患者的并发测量相同,其中干预更可能使DDI诊断(56.3%与21.6%,p <0.001)进行止扰(58.3%对26.6%,p < 0.001)。为市场进行了新的诊断测试,特别是对于公认的临床问题,需要有关临床有效性和临床效用的强大数据。这种后续研究的结果表明,在现实世界患者中使用DDI测试显着改善(1)药物相互作用的初级保健患者管理和(2)患者结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号