首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Cardiology. Heart Vasculature >Non-steroidal treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis: A systematic review
【2h】

Non-steroidal treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis: A systematic review

机译:心脏结节病的非甾体治疗:系统审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The treatment of active cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) usually involves immunosuppressive therapy, with the goal of preventing inflammation-induced scar formation. In most cases, steroids remain the first-line treatment for CS. However, given the side effect profile of their long-term use, steroid-sparing therapies are increasingly used. There are no published randomized trials of steroid-sparing agents in CS. We sought to do a systematic review to evaluate the current published data on the use of non-steroidal treatments in the management of CS. We searched the Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science Core Collection databases from inception of database to August 2020 to identify the effectiveness of biological or synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic agents (s- and bDMARDs). Secondary objectives include safety profile as well as the change in the average corticosteroid dose after treatment initiation. Twenty-three studies were ultimately selected for inclusion which included a total of 480 cases of CS treated with a range of both s- and bDMARDs. In all included studies, sDMARDs and bDMARDs were studied in combination with steroids or as second or higher-line treatments after therapeutic failure or intolerance to corticosteroid use. Methotrexate (MTX) and infliximab (IFX) were the most common synthetic and biologic DMARDs studied respectively, reported in about 35% of the studies reviewed. The use of steroid-sparing agents was associated with a reduction in the maintenance steroid dose used. In conclusion, steroids will remain as the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory management in patients with CS until trials on the use and safety profile of other immunosuppressive agents are completed and published.
机译:治疗活性心脏酸疮(CS)通常涉及免疫抑制治疗,目的是预防炎症诱导的瘢痕形成。在大多数情况下,类固醇仍然是CS的一线治疗。然而,考虑到它们的长期使用的副作用轮廓,越来越多地使用类固醇备件。在CS中没有出版的类固醇备件试剂进行随机试验。我们试图进行系统审查,以评估当前发表的关于在CS管理中使用非甾体处理的数据。我们搜索了Cochrane图书馆,Ovid Medline,Ovid Embase,PubMed和科学核心收集数据库的Web,从数据库到2020年8月2020年识别生物或合成疾病改性抗胃酸剂(S-和BDMARDS)的有效性。次要目标包括安全性曲线以及治疗开始后平均皮质类固醇剂量的变化。最终选择了二十三项研究,含有含有480例CS的CS,包括一系列S和BDMARD。在所有包括的研究中,在治疗失败后与类固醇或作为第二或高度处理的组合研究了SDMARDS和BDMARDs,或者在治疗失败或不耐受皮质类固醇使用。甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和英夫利昔单抗(IFX)是分别研究的最常见的合成和生物学DMARDS,报告了约35%的研究审查。使用类固醇制剂剂与使用的维护类固醇剂量的减少相关。总之,类固醇作为CS患者抗炎管理的基石,直至其其他免疫抑制剂的使用和安全性突破的试验完成并公布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号