首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Retrospective Audit of the Widal Test for Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever in Pediatric Patients in an Endemic Region
【2h】

Retrospective Audit of the Widal Test for Diagnosis of Typhoid Fever in Pediatric Patients in an Endemic Region

机译:流行区儿科病人诊断性肺炎的威达试验的回顾性审核。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Introduction: Although typhoid fever is confirmed by culture of Salmonella Typhi, Widal test is widely used in India but little information exists about its reliability.>Materials and Methods: We examined the performance of Widal test in our hospital for diagnosis of typhoid fever in children. Hundred consecutive pediatric in-patients for whom, the Widal test was requested were grouped into four categories: widal positive and clinically consistent with typhoid fever (Group 1; n=42), widal negative but clinically consistent (Group 2, n=12), widal positive but not clinically consistent (Group 3, n=12) and widal negative and also not clinically consistent (Group 4, n=34). The results were analyzed by the test performance criteria, namely, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) using culture-confirmed typhoid fever cases as the “true positives”.>Results: We found that 7/100 patients had culture-proven typhoid fever. Using a cut off ≥ 50 for O agglutinins or ≥100 for H agglutinins, the Widal test gave a sensitivity of 71.43%, specificity of 47.31%, and a positive predictive value of 09.25% and a negative predictive value of 95.65%.>Conclusion: The Widal test is an easy, inexpensive and relatively non-invasive but is not reliable in our set up because of a low PPV. There is a need for a more efficient rapid diagnostic test for typhoid fever.
机译:>简介:虽然伤寒沙门氏菌的培养证实了伤寒,但维达尔试验在印度已广泛使用,但有关其可靠性的信息很少。>材料和方法:在我院进行维达尔测试,以诊断儿童伤寒。要求进行Widal测试的连续100名儿科住院病人分为四类:阳性的和临床上与伤寒一致的(第1组; n = 42);阴性的但临床上一致的(第2组,n = 12)。 ,Widal阳性但临床上不一致(第3组,n = 12)和widal阴性且临床上也不一致(第4组,n = 34)。使用培养证实的伤寒病例作为“真实阳性”,通过检测性能标准(即敏感性,特异性,阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV))对结果进行了分析。>结果:< / strong>我们发现,有7/100名患者患有经培养证明的伤寒。使用O凝集素的截止值≥50或H凝集素的截止值≥100,维达尔试验得出的敏感性为71.43%,特异性为47.31%,阳性预测值为09.25%,阴性预测值为95.65%。 >结论: Widal测试是一种简单,便宜且相对无创的测试,但由于PPV较低,因此在我们的设置中不可靠。需要针对伤寒的更有效的快速诊断测试。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号