首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research : JCDR >Study in Southern India Among Hypertensive Patients Using ECG To Screen Left Ventricular Hypertrophy – Can We Do It in Rural Health Centres?
【2h】

Study in Southern India Among Hypertensive Patients Using ECG To Screen Left Ventricular Hypertrophy – Can We Do It in Rural Health Centres?

机译:印度南部对使用ECG筛查左心室肥大的高血压患者的研究–我们可以在农村医疗中心进行吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Electrocardiogram (ECG) is a cost effective tool to evaluate left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). However, its reliability is often questionable when compared to the gold standard - echocardiography.The validation of ECG as a tool to diagnose LVH would benefit centres that lack access to echocardiography.>Aim: (1) To assess the efficacy of ECG criteria to screen for left ventricular hypertrophy in comparison to echocardiography. (2) To determine whether ECG can be used as a screening tool for LVH in rural primary health centres.>Materials and Methods: Fifty hypertensive patients admitted to a tertiary level hospital fulfilling the inclusion and the exclusion criteria, were evaluated for LVH using ECG and echocardiography. Romhilt-Estes and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were applied to all subjects and their efficiency in detecting LVH was measured using Kappa statistics in comparison to echocardiography.>Results: Among the 50 patients, 23 had LVH by echocardiography. In comparison to echocardiography, Romhilt-Estes and Sokolow-Lyon criteria were specific for LVH (96.3%, 88.9% respectively), but were poorly sensitive (43.5%, 43.5%). Combining both the criteria, raised the sensitivity to 60.9% and specificity to 85.2%. Kappa statistical analysis showed moderate to fair agreement of the Romhilt-Estes criteria with echocardiography. Both criteria had high positive predictive values (90.9%, 76.9%).>Conclusion: Both Romhilt-Estes and Sokolow-Lyon ECG criteria are poor screening tools due to low sensitivity. But during routine screening of hypertensive patients with ECG alone, if any patient is positive by Romhilt-Estes criteria or both criteria, it would certainly warrant echocardiographic evaluation. As echocardiography cannot be recommended to screen every patient with hypertension in developing countries, initial evaluation using ECG can certainly help in selecting those who require echocardiography.
机译:>背景:心电图(ECG)是评估左心室肥大(LVH)的一种经济有效的工具。然而,与黄金标准-超声心动图相比,其可靠性常常令人质疑。将ECG验证为诊断LVH的工具将使缺乏超声心动图功能的中心受益。>目的:(1)与超声心动图相比,ECG标准筛查左心室肥大的有效性。 (2)确定在农村基层医疗中心是否可以将ECG用作LVH的筛查工具。>材料和方法:有50名符合入选和排除标准的三级医院收治的高血压患者,使用心电图和超声心动图评估左室肥厚。将Romhilt-Estes和Sokolow-Lyon标准应用于所有受试者,并通过Kappa统计数据与超声心动图检查相比较来检测其检测LVH的效率。>结果:在50例患者中,有23例通过超声心动图检查了LVH。与超声心动图相比,Romhilt-Estes和Sokolow-Lyon标准对LVH具有特异性(分别为96.3%,88.9%),但敏感性较差(43.5%,43.5%)。结合这两个标准,可将敏感性提高到60.9%,将特异性提高到85.2%。 Kappa统计分析显示Romhilt-Estes标准与超声心动图有中度到公平的一致性。两项标准均具有较高的阳性预测值(90.9%,76.9%)。>结论:由于敏感性低,Romhilt-Estes和Sokolow-Lyon心电图标准均是较差的筛查工具。但是,在仅对高血压伴有ECG的患者进行常规筛查的过程中,如果根据Romhilt-Estes标准或上述两个标准对任何患者阳性,则肯定需要进行超声心动图评估。由于不能推荐超声心动图对发展中国家的每位高血压患者进行筛查,因此使用心电图进行初步评估无疑可以帮助选择需要超声心动图的患者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号