首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Geriatrics >Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Potential Prescribing Omissions in 82935 Older Hospitalised Adults: Association with Hospital Readmission and Mortality within Six Months
【2h】

Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing and Potential Prescribing Omissions in 82935 Older Hospitalised Adults: Association with Hospital Readmission and Mortality within Six Months

机译:82935名较旧的住院成年人可能不适当的处方和潜在的处方遗漏:与六个月内与医院入院和死亡的联合

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Polypharmacy with “potentially inappropriate medications” (PIMs) and “potential prescribing omissions” (PPOs) are frequent among those 65 and older. We assessed PIMs and PPOs in a retrospective study of 82,935 patients ≥ 65 during their first admission in the period March 2013 through February 2018 to the four acute-care Calgary hospitals. We used the American Geriatric Society (AGS) and STOPP/START criteria to assess PIMs and PPOs. We computed odds ratios (ORs) for key outcomes of concern to patients, their families, and physicians, namely readmission and/or mortality within six months of discharge, and controlled for age, sex, numbers of medications, PIMs, and PPOs. For readmission, the adjusted OR for number of medications was 1.09 (1.09–1.09), for AGS PIMs 1.14 (1.13–1.14), for STOPP PIMs 1.15 (1.14–1.15), for START PPOs 1.04 (1.02–1.06), and for START PPOs correctly prescribed 1.16 (1.14–1.17). For mortality within 6 months of discharge, the adjusted OR for the number of medications was 1.02 (1.01–1.02), for STOPP PIMs 1.07 (1.06–1.08), for AGS PIMs 1.11 (1.10–1.12), for START PPOs 1.31 (1.27–1.34), and for START PPOs correctly prescribed 0.97 (0.94–0.99). Algorithm rule mining identified an 8.772 higher likelihood of mortality with the combination of STOPP medications of duplicate drugs from the same class, neuroleptics, and strong opioids compared to a random relationship, and a 2.358 higher likelihood of readmission for this same set of medications. Detailed discussions between patients, physicians, and pharmacists are needed to improve these outcomes.
机译:与“潜在的药物药物”(PIMS)和“潜在的处方遗漏”(PPO)(PPO)的多药物在65岁及以上频繁。在2013年3月至2018年2月至2018年2月至2018年2月至2018年2月至四项急性护理卡尔加里医院,我们评估了PIMS和PPO≥65患者≥65患者。我们使用美国老年社会(AGS)和停止/开始标准来评估PIMS和PPO。我们计算了对患者,家庭和医生的关注的关键结果,即在六个月内放电六个月内的入院和/或死亡率,以及控制年龄,性别,药物,PIM和PPO。对于再入次,调整后的或用于的药物数为1.09(1.09-1.09),对于AGS PIMS 1.14(1.13-1.14),用于停止PIMS 1.15(1.14-1.15),用于开始PPOS 1.04(1.02-1.06),以及正确规定的PPO标准1.16(1.14-1.17)。出于放电6个月内的死亡率,调整后或用于药物的数量为1.02(1.01-1.02),用于停止PIMS 1.07(1.06-1.08),用于AGS PIMS 1.11(1.10-1.12),用于启动PPOS 1.31(1.27 -1.34),并且开始PPO正确规定0.97(0.94-0.99)。算法规则挖掘确定了与随机关系相比同一类,神经抑制剂和强蛋白质的二份药物的止血药物的组合,对死亡药物的组合,对同一组药物的再次入住的2.358次,对算法的造成额度较高的8772个死亡率。需要进行详细的患者,医生和药剂师来改善这些结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号