首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Translational Medicine >A literature-based approach for curating gene signatures in multifaceted diseases
【2h】

A literature-based approach for curating gene signatures in multifaceted diseases

机译:一种基于文献的含有多方面疾病基因特征的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Workflow of constructing a gene panel that putatively contains subtype signatures of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). a network of the predicted protein–protein interactions (STRING) inferred from the genes associated with immune responses and IBD highlights the complexity and difficulty of making logical interpretation (network image in top-left corner). In order to simplify the process, we devised six gene lists from different sources. Details on the methods used to retrieve the genes, the number of genes in the lists, and the terms used onwards are shown (Gene Lists). Then, we submitted the lists to Venn analysis which resulted in 21 intersections (Venn Analysis). The common (i.e. IBD core genes) and the unique lists for CD, UC, and IBDU were submitted to Literature Lab to obtain pathways and diseases association scores; each gene is ranked based on its contribution weight to a score (Extract Unique Groups–Literature Lab). In the network analysis, the top-ranking genes (those with > 5% contribution to the association) informed which nodes to expand to the primary and secondary nodes. We used both GeneMania and STRING (shown here) to obtain those networks. In the network shown, the edges depict the known protein interactions based on knowledge from curated databases (blue edges), experimentally determined (pink edges), and co-expression data (black edges). Genes without shared pathways are shown as independent nodes. The amalgamation of the gene selections from all the common and subtypes-specific genes amounts to 142 putative target genes
机译:构建基因面板推定包含炎性肠病(IBD)的亚型签名的工作流程。从与免疫应答和IBD有关的基因推断的预测蛋白 - 蛋白相互作用(STRING)的网络突出了复杂性,使逻辑解释(在左上角的网络图像)的难度。为了简化这个过程中,我们设计了不同来源的6名基因的列表。对用于检索基因方法的细节,在列表中的基因起使用的术语的数量,并显示(基因列表)。然后,我们提交了名单,这导致21路交叉口(维恩分析)维恩分析。共同(即IBD核心基因)和用于CD,UC,和IBDU独特列表被提交给文献实验室获得途径和疾病相关性分值;每个基因是基于其贡献权重的分数(提取唯一的组,文学实验室)排名。在网络分析中,排名靠前的基因(那些具有>所述关联5%投稿)通知哪些节点扩展到初级和次级节点。我们使用这两种GeneMania和STRING(如图所示),以获得这些网络。在所示的网络中,边缘描绘基于从策划数据库(蓝色边缘)知识的已知蛋白的相互作用,通过实验确定(粉红色边缘),以及共表达数据(黑边)。没有共享途径的基因被示出为独立的节点。从所有常见和亚型特异性基因的基因选择的合并总计为142个假定的靶基因

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号