首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine >Turning unprofessional behaviors around using Holmes reflection approach: a randomized controlled study
【2h】

Turning unprofessional behaviors around using Holmes reflection approach: a randomized controlled study

机译:在使用福尔摩斯的反思方法周围转动不专业的行为:随机对照研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many medical schools around the world have included professionalism training in their formal curriculum. However, these efforts may not be adequate; given the exposure of students to unprofessional behaviors in the clinical settings. In the present study, we aimed to design, implement, and evaluate a longitudinal program to improve professionalism among medical students upon their transition to clinical settings. A total of 75 medical students were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned to two groups. The control group did not receive any training, while for the intervention group; a 10-hour program through 16 weeks was organized based on the Holmes' reflection approach. The effectiveness of the program was evaluated by measuring three outcomes in both groups. Data analysis was performed using paired t-test and Multiple Linear Regression. Scores of judgment of professionalism increased in the intervention group (from 7.56 to 10.17; P< 0.001), while there was no significant improvement in the control group’s scores. Students' attitudes towards professionalism and their professional behaviors did not change significantly.
机译:世界各地的许多医学院都包括正式课程的专业培训。但是,这些努力可能不足;鉴于学生曝光临床环境中的不专业行为。在本研究中,我们旨在设计,实施和评估纵向计划,以改善医学生在转型到临床环境后的专业性。共有75名医学生在研究中注册并随机分配给两组。对照组没有收到任何培训,而干预组;根据福尔摩斯的反思方法组织了10小时的计划到16周。通过在两组中测量三种结果来评估该程序的有效性。使用配对的T检验和多个线性回归执行数据分析。干预组(从7.56到10.17)增加了专业审判的评分增加,而P <0.001),则对照组的分数没有显着改善。学生对专业性的态度及其专业行为并没有显着变化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号