首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Endocrine Society >MON-125 Structure Process and Outcomes of Transitional Care in Endocrinology: Pilot Results from the Intersect Study (International Study of Endocrine Care During Transition to Adult-Oriented Care)
【2h】

MON-125 Structure Process and Outcomes of Transitional Care in Endocrinology: Pilot Results from the Intersect Study (International Study of Endocrine Care During Transition to Adult-Oriented Care)

机译:内分泌学中过渡性护理的Mon-125结构过程和结果:飞行员来自交叉研究的结果(在过渡到成人护理期间内分泌护理的国际研究)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Structured transitional care (TC) is the planned, purposeful transfer from pediatric to adult care that aims to maintain high quality, developmentally appropriate continuous care. Relatively little is known about how endocrine TC is structured internationally, the process of TC and what outcomes are a priority for endocrine TC. This pilot study aimed to better understand endocrine TC and identify key elements for successful implementation internationally. METHODS: The Donabedian framework (structure-process-outcome) guided the international web-based survey examining TC programs for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) 16–25 years-old. The survey examined: 1) best practices i.e. six core elements of TC (Center for Health Care Transition Improvement ‘Got Transition’); 2) nursing involvement; 3) perceived importance of the ‘10 priority outcomes’ identified by an international multidisciplinary Delphi process (Fair et al. JAMA Pediatrics, 2016); and 4) promoters/barriers to implementation. Descriptive analysis was conducted for close-ended questions and thematic analysis for open-ended questions. Rankings by endocrine clinics were compared to the ‘10 priority outcomes’. RESULTS: Invitations were sent to authors of publications/posters on endocrine TC from the past 10 years. Eight responses were recorded from academic medical centers across seven countries with structured (n=3), semi-structured (n=2) and unstructured TC (n=3). Only 2/8 received institutional funding. Two practices involved nurses in assessing transition readiness and cited direct clinical care, therapeutic education and emotional support for AYAs/families as important contributions. Groups lacking nursing involvement expressed desire for a nursing role if financed. The most commonly used ‘Got Transition’ core elements were: providing supporting materials, confirming adult visit and consulting with adult providers. Only one group formally collected TC outcome data. “Self-management” was rated the most important TC outcome. “Understanding the condition/complications” and “attending medical appointments” were seen as having relatively higher priority for endocrine TC. Barriers related to lack of financial support and low institutional priority. Involving key stakeholders facilitated implementation. Having a dedicated nurse was noted as an opportunity for improving TC. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of structured TC has been piecemeal and most practices do not fully utilize recommended best practices (‘Got Transition’). Few practices formally collect outcome data. The major perceived barrier to implementing TC is financial. Practices incorporating nurses value discipline-specific contributions. These pilot data point to a role for nursing in providing comprehensive, high quality, comprehensive care for AYAs with chronic endocrine conditions.
机译:背景:结构化过渡护理(TC)是从儿科的计划,有目的的转移到成人护理,旨在保持高质量,发育均匀的持续护理。关于内分泌TC如何在国际上进行相对较少的是,TC的过程以及结果是内分泌TC的优先事项。该试点研究旨在更好地了解内分泌TC,并确定国际上成功实施的关键要素。方法:Donabedian框架(结构 - 过程 - 结果)引导了国际网络的调查检查了青少年和年轻人(AYAS)16-25岁的TC计划。调查检测:1)最佳实践即,TC的六个核心要素(医疗保健转型改善'GOT转型); 2)护理参与; 3)在国际多学科DELPHI进程中确定的“10优先考虑”(FAIR等人,2016年贾马特儿科)感知了“2016年贾马儿科”)的重要性; 4)促进者/障碍实施。对近期问题和开放式问题的专题分析进行了描述性分析。将内分泌诊所的排名与“10优先考虑”进行了比较。结果:从过去10年的内分泌TC送到出版物/海报的作者中邀请邀请。在七个国家,结构化(n = 3),半结构化(n = 2)和非结构化Tc(n = 3)中,从学术医疗中心记录了八个响应。只有2/8获得机构资金。两项实践涉及护士评估转型准备,并引用直接临床护理,治疗教育和情感支持,作为AYAS /家庭作为重要贡献。缺乏护理的团体参与如果融资,就表达了护理角色的渴望。最常用的“有过渡”核心要素是:提供支持材料,确认成人访问和与成人提供者进行咨询。只有一组正式收集的TC结果数据。 “自我管理”被评为最重要的TC结果。 “了解条件/并发症”和“参加医疗任命”被视为内分泌TC具有相对较高的优先级。与缺乏财政支持和低制度优先相关的障碍。涉及关键利益攸关方促进了实施。有一个专门的护士被指出作为改善TC的机会。结论:结构化TC的实施一直是零碎的,大多数实践都没有充分利用建议的最佳实践('得到过渡')。很少有实践正式收集结果数据。实施TC的主要感知障碍是财务状况。融合护士价值纪律特定捐款的实践。这些试点数据指向护理方面的作用,为慢性内分泌条件提供全面,高品质,全面的澳洲族。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号