首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the Endocrine Society >MON-518 Institutional Experience with Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: No Molecular Testing Versus Afirma Gene Expression Classifier or Genomic Sequencing Classifier
【2h】

MON-518 Institutional Experience with Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: No Molecular Testing Versus Afirma Gene Expression Classifier or Genomic Sequencing Classifier

机译:Mon-518具有细胞学上不确定的甲状腺结节的机构体验:没有分子检测与Afirma基因表达分类器或基因组测序分类器

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Molecular analysis of indeterminate thyroid nodules has been shown to reduce unnecessary surgeries for benign thyroid nodules. Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) has a reported benign call rate (BCR) of 38-61%, and the newer generation Genomic Sequencing Classifier (GSC) has a reported BCR of 42-76%. Both GEC and GSC have a high sensitivity of 88-100% and negative predictive value (NPV) of 94-100%. Specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) have improved with GSC when compared to GEC, largely due to improvements in the classification of hurtle cell neoplasms. GSC PPV is reported as 47-76%. The aim of our study was to determine surgical and malignancy rates for patients at our institution with GEC, GSC, or for those who did not undergo molecular testing.
机译:背景:已显示不确定甲状腺结节的分子分析,以减少良性甲状腺结节的不必要的手术。 AFIRMA基因表达分类器(GEC)报告的良性呼叫率(BCR)为38-61%,新一代基因组测序分类剂(GSC)报告的BCR为42-76%。 GEC和GSC均具有88-100%的高灵敏度,阴性预测值(NPV)为94-100%。与GEC相比,特异性和阳性预测值(PPV)改善了GSC,主要是由于潮汐细胞瘤的分类的改善。 GSC PPV报告为47-76%。我们的研究目的是确定我们的机构患者的外科和恶性率,与GEC,GSC,或没有接受分子测试的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号