首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >165 Grazing evaluation of pearlillet with and without soybean hull supplementation in a forage-finished beef production system
【2h】

165 Grazing evaluation of pearlillet with and without soybean hull supplementation in a forage-finished beef production system

机译:165在饲料成品牛肉生产系统中珍珠菌放牧评价珍珠菌和没有大豆船体补充

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pearl millet may be a viable forage option in forage-finished beef production systems due to favorable agronomic traits and nutritive value. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate two varieties of pearl millet with and without soybean hull supplementation in a forage-finished beef production system. In a two-year grazing trial, sixteen 0.81-ha paddocks were randomly assigned to one of four treatments in a 2x2 factorial design: ‘Tifleaf 3’ pearl millet (PM) and ‘Exceed’ pearl millet (BMR) without and with soybean hull supplementation (0.75% of body weight (BW); PM+S and BMR+S, respectively). Each year, Angus crossbred steers (n = 32; BW = 444±59 kg) were paired to minimize variability among pairs. Pairs were randomly assigned to treatment paddocks. Grazing was initiated in June when forage was approximately 60-cm in height and terminated after approximately 90 d of rotational grazing. Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated from weights taken at grazing initiation and termination following an 18-h fast. Steers were harvested in September and carcass data were collected 24-h postmortem. All data were analyzed using PROC GLIMMIX (SAS v.9.4). Supplemented steers exhibited greater (P < 0.01) ADG than non-supplemented steers. No difference (P > 0.05) was observed for ADG between forage varieties. Pre-harvest shrunk weight, hot carcass weight (HCW), dressing percent (DP), and ribeye area were similar (P > 0.05) within supplemented and non-supplemented steers across forage varieties. Shrunk weight, HCW, and DP were similar (P > 0.05) for BMR+S and BMR. Rib-eye area was similar (P > 0.05) for BMR+S, PM+S, and PM. No differences (P > 0.05) were observed for fat thickness, adjusted fat thickness, yield grade, marbling score, or overall maturity. Results indicate pearl millet is a viable warm-season forage option for forage-finished beef systems in the Southeast and soybean hull supplementation can improve animal performance over forage alone.
机译:由于农艺性状和营养价值有利,珍珠小米可以是牧草牛肉生产系统中的可行牧草选项。因此,本研究的目的是评估两种珍珠米,在牧草生产系统中没有大豆壳体补充。在两年的放牧审判中,将60.81-HA围场随机分配到2x2因子设计中的四个治疗中的一个治疗中的一个:'TIFLEAF 3'珍珠小米(PM)和'超过'珍珠小米(BMR)没有和大豆船体补充(0.75%体重(BW); PM + S和BMR + S)。每年,Angus杂交操纵器(n = 32; BW = 444±59千克)成对以最小化对之间的变化。对随机分配给治疗围场。当饲料在高度约为60厘米时,在6月份开始进行放牧,并在大约90 d旋转放牧后终止。平均每日增益(ADG)由在速度迅速放牧起始和终止后的重量计算。 9月份收获阉牛,24小时后收集胴体数据。使用PROC GLIMMIX(SAS V.9.4)分析所有数据。补充阉牛比不补充的阉牛展现较大(P <0.01)。对于饲料品种之间的ADG没有观察到差异(p> 0.05)。预先收获缩小重量,热胴体重量(HCW),敷料百分比(DP)和Ribeye区域在牧草品种的补充和不补充的阉牛内相似(p> 0.05)。 BMR + S和BMR的缩减重量,HCW和DP是相似的(p> 0.05)。 BMR + S,PM + S和PM相似(p> 0.05)相似(p> 0.05)。对于脂肪厚度,调节脂肪厚度,产量等级,大理石尺度或整体成熟度,没有观察到差异(p> 0.05)。结果表明,珍珠小米是东南部牧草牛肉系统的可行暖季牧草选项,大豆壳补充可以单独提高动物性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号