首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Animal Science >What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?
【2h】

What is the digestibility and caloric value of different botanical parts in corn residue to cattle?

机译:玉米残留物对牛的不同植物零件的消化率和热量值是什么?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Two experiments were conducted to measure rates of ruminal disappearance, and energy and nutrient availability and N balance among cows fed corn husks, leaves, or stalks. Ruminal disappearance was estimated after incubation of polyester bags containing husks, leaves or stalks in 2 separate ruminally cannulated cows in a completely randomized design. Organic matter (OM) that initially disappeared was greatest for stalks and least for husks and leaves (P < 0.01), but amounts of NDF that initially disappeared was greatest for husks, intermediate for stalks, and least for leaves (P < 0.01). Amounts of DM and OM that slowly disappeared were greatest in husks, intermediate in leaves, and least in stalks (P < 0.01). However, amounts of NDF that slowly disappeared were greatest in leaves, intermediate in husks, and least in stalks (P < 0.01). Rate of DM and OM disappearance was greater for leaves, intermediate for husks and least for stalks, but rate of NDF disappearance was greatest for stalks, intermediate for leaves, and least for husks (P < 0.01). Energy and nutrient availability in husks, leaves, or stalks were measured by feeding ruminally cannulated cows husk-, leaf-, or stalk-based diets in a replicated Latin square. Digestible energy lost as methane was less (P = 0.02) when cows were fed leaves in comparison to husks or stalks, and metabolizable energy (Mcal/kg DM) was greater (P = 0.03) when cows were fed husks and leaves compared with stalks. Heat production (Mcal/d) was not different (P = 0.74) between husks, leaves, or stalks; however, amounts of heat produced as a proportion of digestible energy intake were less (P = 0.05) among cows fed leaves in comparison to stalks or husks. Subsequently, there was a tendency (P = 0.06) for net energy available for maintenance from leaves (1.42 Mcal/kg DM) to be greater than stalks (0.91 Mcal/kg DM), and husks (1.30 Mcal/kg DM) were intermediate. Nitrogen balance was greater when cows were fed leaves, intermediate for husks, and least for stalks (P = 0.01). Total tract digestion of NDF was greater (P < 0.01) for husks and leaves compared with stalks. Husks had greater (P = 0.04) OM digestibility in comparison to stalks, and leaves were intermediate. Apparently, greater production of methane from husks in comparison to leaves limited amounts of energy available for maintenance from husks even though total-tract nutrient digestion was greatest when cows were fed husks or leaves.
机译:进行了两次实验以测量瘤胃消失的速度,以及喂养玉米壳,叶子或秸秆的牛群中的能量和养分可用性和N平衡。在完全随机的设计中含有壳,叶片或茎的聚酯袋的孵育后估计了瘤胃消失。最初消失的有机物(OM)最伟大的茎秆和壳和叶子最少(P <0.01),但最初消失的NDF是最伟大的壳,茎的中间体,叶片最少(P <0.01)。慢慢消失的DM和OM的数量最大,在壳中,中间体中的中间体,至少在茎中(P <0.01)。然而,慢慢消失的NDF量在叶片,壳中的中间体中最伟大,并且至少在茎中(P <0.01)。 DM和OM失踪的速度对于叶子而言,壳体的中间体和至少用于茎秆的速度更大,但对于茎秆,叶片中间体的NDF消失的速率最大,并且至少适用于壳(P <0.01)。通过在复制的拉丁方形中喂养铭文套管蹄壳,叶片或基于茎秆的饮食来测量壳壳,叶或秸秆中的能量和营养可用性。与壳或秸秆相比,当奶牛喂食叶片时,作为甲烷损失的可消化能量较少(p = 0.02),当奶牛被喂食壳和叶片时,奶牛(P = 0.03)较大(P = 0.03) 。热量生产(MCAL / D)在壳体,叶子或茎之间没有不同(p = 0.74);然而,与秸秆或壳体相比,喂养叶片的牛饲料中产生的易消化能量摄入比例的热量较小(p = 0.05)。随后,对于可用于维持叶子(1.42mcal / kg dm)的净能量,存在趋势(p = 0.06),以大于茎(0.91mcal / kg dm),壳(1.30 mcal / kg dm)是中间的。当牛喂食叶片,壳体中间体时,氮气平衡较大,并且至少适用于茎(P = 0.01)。与秸秆相比,壳体和叶子的NDF总体较大(P <0.01)更大(P <0.01)。与秸秆相比,壳壳具有更大(p = 0.04)的常量消化率,叶片是中间体。显然,壳体中甲烷的甲烷相比,即使在奶牛喂养壳或叶子时,患有总养分消化的总养生能量也可用于维持有限的能量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号