首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research >Medicolegal Sidebar: Peer Review of Professional Competence
【2h】

Medicolegal Sidebar: Peer Review of Professional Competence

机译:Medicolegal侧边栏:对专业能力的同行评审

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Medical practice is considered to be a self-regulating profession. Quality control mechanisms in a hospital or group practice include regular monitoring, assessing, and improving the healthcare delivered by providers. Peer review of the quality of healthcare delivery of individual physicians is usually triggered by a concern raised by hospital staff. This type of review is done by a committee of fellow physicians at the same institution—a sometimes awkward process because physicians may be reluctant to criticize fellow professionals. It has been said that “physicians who serve on peer review boards make neither money nor friends” [1]. Litigation risk may further chill peer review and its attendant quality goals.
机译:医疗实践被认为是一个自我监管的职业。医院或团体实践中的质量控制机制包括定期监测,评估和改进提供商提供的医疗保健。对个人医生的医疗保健质量的同行评审通常是由医院工作人员提出的令人担忧引发的。这种类型的审查由同一机构的同伴医生委员会 - 一个有时尴尬的过程所因为,因为医生可能不愿意批评同事。有人说,“在同行审查委员会服务的医生既不是钱也不是朋友”[1]。诉讼风险可能会进一步冷静同行评审及其服务员质量目标。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号