首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Clinical Medicine >Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for People Aged 75 Years and over with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies
【2h】

Effectiveness and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants versus Vitamin K Antagonists for People Aged 75 Years and over with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies

机译:口服抗凝剂与维生素K拮抗剂对75岁及以上心房颤动的有效性和安全性:观察性研究的系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Older people, are underrepresented in randomised controlled trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to combine data from observational studies to provide evidence for the treatment of people aged ≥75 years. Medline, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science were searched. The primary effectiveness outcome was ischaemic stroke. Safety outcomes were major bleeding, intracranial haemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, myocardial infarction, and mortality. Twenty-two studies were eligible for inclusion. Two studies related specifically to people ≥75 years but were excluded from meta-analysis due to low quality; all data in the meta-analyses were from subgroups. The pooled risk estimate of ischaemic stroke was slightly lower for DOACs. There was no significant difference in major bleeding, mortality, or myocardial infarction. Risk of intracranial haemorrhage was 44% lower with DOACs, but risk of GI bleeding was 46% higher. Our results suggest that DOACs may be preferable for the majority of older patients with AF, provided they are not at significant risk of a GI bleed. However, these results are based entirely on data from subgroup analyses so should be interpreted cautiously. There is a need for adequately powered research in this patient group.
机译:老年人在直接预防性心房颤动(AF)的直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)的随机对照试验中所占的比例不足。这项研究的目的是结合来自观察性研究的数据,为治疗≥75岁的人提供证据。搜索Medline,Embase,Scopus和Web of Science。主要疗效结果是缺血性中风。安全性结果为大出血,颅内出血,胃肠道出血,心肌梗塞和死亡率。有22项研究符合纳入条件。有两项研究专门针对75岁以上的人群,但由于质量低而被排除在荟萃分析之外。荟萃分析中的所有数据均来自亚组。对于DOAC,合并缺血性卒中的风险评估略低。大出血,死亡率或心肌梗塞无明显差异。使用DOAC时,颅内出血的风险降低了44%,而胃肠道出血的风险则提高了46%。我们的结果表明,DOAC对于大多数老年房颤患者可能更可取,只要他们没有明显的GI出血风险即可。但是,这些结果完全基于亚组分析的数据,因此应谨慎解释。在该患者组中需要进行足够的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号