首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice >Simulated Patient Role-Plays with Consumers with Lived Experience of Mental Illness Post-Mental Health First Aid Training: Interrater and Test Re-Test Reliability of an Observed Behavioral Assessment Rubric
【2h】

Simulated Patient Role-Plays with Consumers with Lived Experience of Mental Illness Post-Mental Health First Aid Training: Interrater and Test Re-Test Reliability of an Observed Behavioral Assessment Rubric

机译:模拟患者的角色扮演消费者的精神疾病后期疗养急救培训:Interrater和测试重新测试可靠性的观察到的行为评估量规

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mental Health First Aid (MHFA) training teaches participants how to assist people experiencing mental health problems and crises. Observed behavioral assessments, post-training, are lacking, and the literature largely focuses on self-reported measurement of behaviors and confidence. This study explores the reliability of an observed behavioral assessment rubric used to assess pharmacy students during simulated patient (SP) role-play assessments with mental health consumers. Post-MHFA training, pharmacy students (n = 528) participated in SP role-play assessments (n = 96) of six mental health cases enacted by consumers with lived experience of mental illness. Each assessment was marked by the tutor, participating student, and consumer (three raters). Non-parametric tests were used to compare raters’ means scores and pass/fail categories. Interrater reliability analyses were conducted for overall scores, as well as pass/fail categories using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) and Fleiss’ Kappa, respectively. Test re-test reliability analyses were conducted using Pearson’s correlation. For interrater reliability analyses, the intra-class correlation coefficient varied from poor-to-good to moderate-to-excellent for individual cases but was moderate-to-excellent for combined cases (0.70; CI 0.58–0.80). Fleiss’ Kappa varied across cases but was fair-to-good for combined cases (0.57, p < 0.001). For test re-test reliability analyses, Pearson’s correlation was strong for individual and combined cases (0.87; p < 0.001). Recommended modifications to the rubric, including the addition of barrier items, scoring guides, and specific examples, as well as the creation of new case-specific rubric versions, may improve reliability. The rubric can be used to facilitate the measurement of actual, observed behaviors post-MHFA training in pharmacy and other health care curricula.
机译:心理健康急救(MHFA)培训教授参与者如何协助体验心理健康问题和危机的人。观察到的行为评估,训练后缺乏,文献在很大程度上侧重于自我报告的行为和信心的测量。本研究探讨了观察到的行为评估规范的可靠性,用于评估药学学生在模拟患者(SP)角色效果评估中的精神健康消费者。 MHFA培训后,药房学生(n = 528)参加了由消费者颁布的六种心理健康案件的SP角色播放评估(n = 96),患有精神疾病的经验。每次评估都标有导师,参与的学生和消费者(三位评估者)。非参数测试用于比较评估者的意思分数和通过/失败类别。 Interriter可靠性分析进行了整体评分,以及使用类别相关系数(ICC)和Fleiss'Kappa的通过/失败类别。使用Pearson的相关性进行测试重新测试可靠性分析。对于Interrater可靠性分析,类内相关系数因各个病例而异到至优异的差,而且对于组合案例,适中性为高度至优异(0.70; CI 0.58-0.80)。 Fleiss'Kappa在案例中变化,但对于组合案例(0.57,P <0.001)是公平的。对于测试重新测试可靠性分析,Pearson的相关性具有强大的个体和组合案例(0.87; P <0.001)。建议对标题的修改,包括添加屏障项目,评分指南和具体示例,以及创建新的特定于特定的标题版本,可以提高可靠性。标题可用于促进药房和其他医疗课程中MHFA后的实际观察行为的测量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号