首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Materials >Physico-Chemical Investigation of Endodontic Sealers Exposed to Simulated Intracanal Heat Application: Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers
【2h】

Physico-Chemical Investigation of Endodontic Sealers Exposed to Simulated Intracanal Heat Application: Hydraulic Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers

机译:模拟骨膜热应用暴露的牙髓密封剂的物理化学研究:液压硅酸钙基密封剂

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to gain information about the effect of thermal treatment of calcium silicate-based sealers. BioRoot RCS (BR), Total Fill BC Sealer (TFBC), and Total Fill BC Sealer HiFlow (TFHF) were exposed to thermal treatment at 37 °C, 47 °C, 57 °C, 67 °C, 77 °C, 87 °C and 97 °C for 30 s. Heat treatment at 97 °C was performed for 60 and 180 s to simulate inappropriate application of warm obturation techniques. Thereafter, specimens were cooled to 37 °C and physical properties (setting time/flow/film thickness according to ISO 6876) were evaluated. Chemical properties (Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy) were assessed after incubation of the specimens in an incubator at 37 °C and 100% humidity for 8 weeks. Statistical analysis of physical properties was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis-Test (P = 0.05). The setting time, flow, and film thickness of TFBC and TFHF were not relevantly influenced by thermal treatment. Setting time of BR decreased slightly when temperature of heat application increased from 37 °C to 77 °C (P < 0.05). Further heat treatment of BR above 77 °C led to an immediate setting. FT-IR spectroscopy did not reveal any chemical changes for either sealers. Thermal treatment did not lead to any substantial chemical changes at all temperature levels, while physical properties of BR were compromised by heating. TFBC and TFHF can be considered suitable for warm obturation techniques.
机译:本研究的目的是获得有关硅酸钙的封闭剂热处理的影响的信息。 Biorot RCS(BR),总填充BC封口机(TFBC)和总填充BC封口机HIFLOW(TFHF)在37°C,47°C,57°C,67°C,77°C,87处暴露于热处理。 °C和97°C 30秒。在97℃下进行热处理60和180秒,以模拟不适当的耐热性技术。此后,将试样冷却至37℃,评价物理性质(根据ISO 6876设定的设定时间/流动/膜厚度)。在37℃和100%湿度下在培养箱中温育后,评估化学性质(傅里叶变换红外光谱)在37℃和100%湿度下8周。使用Kruskal-Wallis-Test进行物理性质的统计分析(P = 0.05)。 TFBC和TFHF的设定时间,流动和膜厚度不相关的热处理影响。当热施加温度从37℃增加至77°C时,Br的设定时间略微下降(P <0.05)。在77°C以上的BR的进一步热处理导致立即设置。 FT-IR光谱没有揭示任何一个密封剂的化学变化。热处理不会导致所有温度水平的任何大量化学变化,而BR的物理性质受加热损害。 TFBC和TFHF可以考虑适用于温暖的取消技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号